Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug 24:8:723375.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.723375. eCollection 2021.

Risk Factors of African Swine Fever in Domestic Pigs of the Samara Region, Russian Federation

Affiliations

Risk Factors of African Swine Fever in Domestic Pigs of the Samara Region, Russian Federation

Anastasia A Glazunova et al. Front Vet Sci. .

Abstract

African swine fever (ASF) is an incurable viral disease of domestic and wild pigs. A large-scale spread of ASF began in Eurasia in 2007 and has affected territories from Belgium to the Far East, occurring as both local- and regional-level epidemics. In 2020, a massive ASF epidemic emerged in the southeastern region of European Russia in the Samara Oblast and included 41 outbreaks of ASF in domestic pigs and 40 cases in wild boar. The Samara Oblast is characterized by a relatively low density of wild boar (0.04-0.05 head/km2) and domestic pigs (1.1-1.3 head/km2), with a high prevalence of small-scale productions (household farms). This study aims to understand the driving forces of the disease and perform a risk assessment for this region using complex epidemiological analyses. The socioeconomic and environmental factors of the ASF outbreak were explored using Generalized Linear Logistic Regression, where ASF infection status of the Samara Oblast districts was treated as a response variable. Presence of the virus in a district was found to be most significantly (p < 0.05) associated with the importation of live pigs from ASF-affected regions of Russia (OR = 371.52; 95% CI: 1.58-87290.57), less significantly (p < 0.1) associated with the density of smallholder farms (OR = 2.94; 0.82-10.59), volume of pork products' importation from ASF-affected regions of Russia (OR = 1.01; 1.00-1.02), summary pig population (OR = 1.01; 0.99-1.02), and insignificantly (p > 0.1) associated with presence of a common border with an ASF-affected region (OR = 89.2; 0.07-11208.64). No associations were found with the densities of pig and wild boar populations. The colocation analysis revealed no significant concentration of outbreaks in domestic pigs near cases in wild boar or vice versa. These results suggest that outbreaks notified in low biosecurity household farms were mainly associated with the transportation and trade of pigs and pork products from ASF-affected regions of Russia. The findings underline the importance of taking into account animal transportation data while conducting future studies to develop a risk map for the region and the rest of European Russia.

Keywords: African swine fever; Russian Federation; Samara region; animal movement; colocation analysis; logistic regression; low-biosecurity farms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The epidemiological overview of African swine fever (ASF) in the Russian Federation in 2007–2020 (A). The ASF outbreaks in the Samara Oblast in 2020 and revealed spatial-temporal cluster of outbreaks (B).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Temporal distribution of African swine fever cases in domestic pigs and wild boar in the Samara Oblast in 2020.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Results of the colocation analysis of African swine fever (ASF) cases in wild boar (WB) near outbreaks in domestic pigs (DP) (left). Colocation of outbreaks in DP near cases in WB (right). Top maps indicate the results for the analysis time span of 14 days, while bottom maps indicated the results for 45-days' time span.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Predicted probability of having an African swine fever (ASF) outbreak in domestic pigs (DP) in the Samara oblast (left), and the distribution of deviance residuals (right).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wu K, Liu J, Wang L, Fan S, Li Z, Li Y, et al. . Current state of global african swine fever vaccine development under the prevalence and transmission of ASF in China. Vaccines. (2020) 8:1–26. 10.3390/vaccines8030531 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dixon LK, Stahl K, Jori F, Vial L, Pfeiffer DiU. African swine fever epidemiology and control. Annu Rev Anim Biosci. (2020) 8:221–46. 10.1146/annurev-animal-021419-083741 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chenais E, Depner K, Guberti V, Dietze K, Viltrop A, Ståhl K. Epidemiological considerations on African swine fever in Europe 2014–2018. Porcine Health Management BioMed Central Ltd. (2019) 5:6. 10.1186/s40813-018-0109-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Penrith ML. Current status of African swine fever. CABI Agric Biosci [Internet]. (2020) 1:11. 10.1186/s43170-020-00011-w - DOI - PubMed
    1. Belyanin S. Dynamic of spreading and monitoring of epizootological process of african swine fever in Russian Federation. (2013). Available online at: http://vniivvim.ru/dissertation/advert/

LinkOut - more resources