Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun;25(2):191-207.
doi: 10.1007/s10729-021-09579-9. Epub 2021 Sep 10.

A two-phase approach for the Radiotherapy Scheduling Problem

Affiliations

A two-phase approach for the Radiotherapy Scheduling Problem

Tu-San Pham et al. Health Care Manag Sci. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

The Radiotherapy Scheduling Problem (RTSP) focuses on optimizing the planning of radiotherapy treatment sessions for cancer patients. In this paper, we propose a two-phase approach for the RTSP. In the first phase, radiotherapy sessions are assigned to specific linear accelerators (linacs) and days. The second phase then decides the sequence of patients on each day/linac and the specific appointment times. For the first phase, an Integer Linear Programming (IP) model is proposed and solved using CPLEX. For the second phase, a Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MIP) and a Constraint Programming (CP) model are proposed. The test data is generated based on real data from CHUM, a large cancer center in Montréal, Canada, with an average of 3,500 new patients and 40,000 radiotherapy treatments per year. The results show that in the second phase, CP is better at finding good solutions quickly while MIP is better at closing optimality gaps with more run time. Lastly, a simulation is conducted to evaluate the impact of different scheduling strategies on the outcome of the scheduling. Preliminary results show that batch scheduling reduces patients' waiting time and overdue time.

Keywords: Constraint Programming; Integer Programming; Operations research; Radiotherapy scheduling; Simulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Barton MB, Jacob S, Shafiq J, Wong K, Thompson SR, Hanna TP, Delaney G (2014) Estimating the demand for radiotherapy from the evidence: a review of changes from 2003 to 2012. Radiother Oncol 112(1):140–144 - DOI
    1. Burke EK, Leite-Rocha P, Petrovic S (2011) An integer linear programming model for the radiotherapy treatment scheduling problem. arXiv: 1103.3391
    1. Castro E, Petrovic S (2012) Combined mathematical programming and heuristics for a radiotherapy pre-treatment scheduling problem. J Sched 15(3):333–346 - DOI
    1. Chen Z, King W, Pearcey R, Kerba M, Mackillop W (2008) The relationship between waiting time for radiotherapy and clinical outcomes: a systematic review of the literature. Radiother Oncol 87(1):3–16 - DOI
    1. Coles CE, Burgess L, Tan LT (2003) An audit of delays before and during radical radiotherapy for cervical cancer–effect on tumour cure probability. Clin Oncol 15(2):47–54 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources