Public preferences for the allocation of donor organs for transplantation: A discrete choice experiment
- PMID: 34507218
- DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114360
Public preferences for the allocation of donor organs for transplantation: A discrete choice experiment
Abstract
This study aimed to assess public preferences for the allocation of donor organs in Germany with the focus on ethical principles of distributive justice. We performed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) using a self-completed online questionnaire. Based on a systematic review and focus group discussions, six attributes, each with two-four levels, were selected (corresponding principle of distributive justice in brackets), including (1) life years gained after transplantation (principle of distributive justice: effectiveness/benefit - utilitarianism), (2) quality of life after transplantation (effectiveness/benefit - utilitarianism), (3) chance for a further donor organ offer (principle of distributive justice: medical urgency - favouring the worst-off), (4) age (medical and social risk factors: sociodemographic status), (5) registered donor (principle of distributive justice: value for society), and (6) individual role in causing organ failure (principle of distributive justice: own fault). Each respondent was presented with eight choice sets and asked to choose between two hypothetical patients without an opt-out. Data were analysed using conditional logit, mixed logit and latent class models. The final sample comprised 1028 respondents. Choice decisions were significantly influenced by all attributes except chance for a further donor organ offer. The attributes of good quality of life after transplantation, younger age, and no individual role in causing organ failure had the greatest impact on choice decisions. Life years gained after transplantation and being a registered donor were less important for the public. The latent class model identified four classes with preference heterogeneities. Respondents preferred to allocate deceased donor organs by criteria related to effectiveness/benefit, whereas medical urgency was of minor importance. Therefore, a public propensity for a rational, utilitarian, ethical model of allocation could be identified. Public preferences can help to inform policy to warrant socially responsible allocation systems and thus improve organ donation rates.
Keywords: Discrete choice experiment; Distributive justice; Germany; Organ allocation; Preferences; Public perspective.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Systematic Review of Public Preferences for the Allocation of Donor Organs for Transplantation: Principles of Distributive Justice.Patient. 2019 Oct;12(5):475-489. doi: 10.1007/s40271-019-00363-0. Patient. 2019. PMID: 30957196
-
Public, medical professionals' and patients' preferences for the allocation of donor organs for transplantation: study protocol for discrete choice experiments.BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 17;8(10):e026040. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026040. BMJ Open. 2018. PMID: 30337317 Free PMC article.
-
Public preferences for the allocation of donor organs for transplantation: Focus group discussions.Health Expect. 2020 Jun;23(3):670-680. doi: 10.1111/hex.13047. Epub 2020 Mar 18. Health Expect. 2020. PMID: 32189453 Free PMC article.
-
Preferences for Policy Options for Deceased Organ Donation for Transplantation: A Discrete Choice Experiment.Transplantation. 2016 May;100(5):1136-48. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000940. Transplantation. 2016. PMID: 26457603
-
Ethics of allocation of donor organs.Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2023 Jun 1;28(3):192-196. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000001058. Epub 2023 Feb 10. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2023. PMID: 36787240 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Setting Organ Allocation Priorities: A Discrete Choice Experiment with German Patients and Their Relatives.Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Mar 24;17:827-838. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S402203. eCollection 2023. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023. PMID: 36999164 Free PMC article.
-
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 Aug;43(8):879-936. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y. Epub 2025 May 21. Pharmacoeconomics. 2025. PMID: 40397369 Free PMC article.
-
The path towards herd immunity: Predicting COVID-19 vaccination uptake through results from a stated choice study across six continents.Soc Sci Med. 2022 Apr;298:114800. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114800. Epub 2022 Feb 16. Soc Sci Med. 2022. PMID: 35287066 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical