Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 1;107(1):88-97.
doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab641.

Association of MAFLD With Diabetes, Chronic Kidney Disease, and Cardiovascular Disease: A 4.6-Year Cohort Study in China

Affiliations

Association of MAFLD With Diabetes, Chronic Kidney Disease, and Cardiovascular Disease: A 4.6-Year Cohort Study in China

Yebei Liang et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. .

Abstract

Context: In 2020, the terminology of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) was proposed to replace nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).

Objectives: This work aimed to investigate the prevalence and incidence of MAFLD and evaluate its effects on incident extrahepatic diseases.

Methods: A total of 6873 individuals, with a 4.6-year follow-up, were included in this study. Associations of MAFLD and NAFLD with diabetes, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and cardiovascular disease (CVD) were examined using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models.

Results: The prevalence of NAFLD and MAFLD was 40.3% (95% CI, 39.2%-41.5%) and 46.7% (95% CI, 45.6%-47.9%), respectively. Additionally, 321 (4.7%) and 156 (2.3%) participants had MAFLD with excessive alcohol consumption and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. During the follow-up period, the incidence of NAFLD and MAFLD was 22.7% (95% CI, 21.3%-24.0%) and 27.0% (95% CI, 25.5%-28.4%). MAFLD was associated with higher risks of incident diabetes (risk ratio [RR] 2.08; 95% CI, 1.72-2.52), CKD (RR 1.64; 95% CI, 1.39-1.94), and CVD (hazard ratio 1.44; 95% CI, 1.15-1.81). Similar associations for NAFLD were observed. Furthermore, the MAFLD subgroups with excessive alcohol consumption (RR 2.49; 95% CI, 1.64-3.78) and HBV infection (RR 1.98; 95% CI, 1.11-3.52) were associated with higher risks of incident diabetes.

Conclusion: The change from NAFLD to MAFLD did not greatly affect the associations with diabetes, CKD, and CVD. MAFLD further identified those patients of metabolically fatty liver combined with excessive alcohol consumption and HBV infection, who had increased risks of incident diabetes compared with those of non-fatty liver.

Keywords: cardiovascular disease; chronic kidney disease; diabetes; metabolic dysfunction–associated fatty liver disease; nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flowchart of study population. MAFLD, metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
A, Prevalence, and B, incidence, of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and metabolic dysfunction–associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Associations of metabolic dysfunction–associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) with prevalent diabetes. *Metabolic dysfunction was defined as the presence of at least 1 of 3 criteria: overweight/obesity, diabetes, or metabolic dysregulation. †Model 1 was adjusted for age and sex. ‡Model 2: model 1 plus adjustment for educational background, smoking status, and leisure-time exercise at baseline. HBV, hepatitis B virus; non-FL, non–fatty liver; OR, odds ratio.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Associations of metabolic dysfunction–associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) with incident diabetes. *Metabolic dysfunction was defined as the presence of at least 1 of 3 criteria: overweight/obesity, diabetes, or metabolic dysregulation. †Model 1 was adjusted for age and sex. ‡Model 2: model 1 plus adjustment for educational background, smoking status, and leisure-time exercise at baseline. HBV, hepatitis B virus; non-FL, non–fatty liver; RR, risk ratio.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Younossi ZM, Koenig AB, Abdelatif D, Fazel Y, Henry L, Wymer M. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease—meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology. 2016;64(1):73-84. - PubMed
    1. Zhou F, Zhou J, Wang W, et al. . Unexpected rapid increase in the burden of NAFLD in China from 2008 to 2018: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatology. 2019;70(4):1119-1133. - PubMed
    1. Choi HSJ, Brouwer WP, Zanjir WMR, et al. . Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is associated with liver-related outcomes and all-cause mortality in chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2020;71(2):539-548. - PubMed
    1. Chiang DJ, McCullough AJ. The impact of obesity and metabolic syndrome on alcoholic liver disease. Clin Liver Dis. 2014;18(1):157-163. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eslam M, Newsome PN, Sarin SK, et al. . A new definition for metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: an international expert consensus statement. J Hepatol. 2020;73(1):202-209. - PubMed

Publication types