Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2021 Nov;148(5):1176-1191.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.08.021. Epub 2021 Sep 8.

Immunologic resilience and COVID-19 survival advantage

Collaborators, Affiliations
Observational Study

Immunologic resilience and COVID-19 survival advantage

Grace C Lee et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 Nov.

Abstract

Background: The risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) varies significantly among persons of similar age and is higher in males. Age-independent, sex-biased differences in susceptibility to severe COVID-19 may be ascribable to deficits in a sexually dimorphic protective attribute that we termed immunologic resilience (IR).

Objective: We sought to examine whether deficits in IR that antedate or are induced by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection independently predict COVID-19 mortality.

Methods: IR levels were quantified with 2 novel metrics: immune health grades (IHG-I [best] to IHG-IV) to gauge CD8+ and CD4+ T-cell count equilibrium, and blood gene expression signatures. IR metrics were examined in a prospective COVID-19 cohort (n = 522); primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Associations of IR metrics with outcomes in non-COVID-19 cohorts (n = 13,461) provided the framework for linking pre-COVID-19 IR status to IR during COVID-19, as well as to COVID-19 outcomes.

Results: IHG-I, tracking high-grade equilibrium between CD8+ and CD4+ T-cell counts, was the most common grade (73%) among healthy adults, particularly in females. SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with underrepresentation of IHG-I (21%) versus overrepresentation (77%) of IHG-II or IHG-IV, especially in males versus females (P < .01). Presentation with IHG-I was associated with 88% lower mortality, after controlling for age and sex; reduced risk of hospitalization and respiratory failure; lower plasma IL-6 levels; rapid clearance of nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 burden; and gene expression signatures correlating with survival that signify immunocompetence and controlled inflammation. In non-COVID-19 cohorts, IR-preserving metrics were associated with resistance to progressive influenza or HIV infection, as well as lower 9-year mortality in the Framingham Heart Study, especially in females.

Conclusions: Preservation of immunocompetence with controlled inflammation during antigenic challenges is a hallmark of IR and associates with longevity and AIDS resistance. Independent of age, a male-biased proclivity to degrade IR before and/or during SARS-CoV-2 infection predisposes to severe COVID-19.

Keywords: AIDS; Aging; COVID-19; HIV; SARS-CoV-2; biomarkers; immune; inflammation; influenza.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Fig 1
Fig 1
IHG associations in study cohorts. A and B, IHG features. Ratio, CD4:CD8 ratio. C,Left: IHG prevalence in SardiNIA cohort by sex and age strata and females with SLE. Middle: IHG at presentation in the COVID-19 cohort by sex, hospitalization and survivor status, and nonsurvivors by age. Right: IHG in therapy-naive HIV+ participants (with known dates of seroconversion) at entry into the Natural History Study by entry viral load (VL; <1K, 1-10K, 10-100K, ≥100K copies/mL; K, ×103). Rightmost: IHGs before and after at least 5 years of antiretroviral therapy (ART). D, IHG prevalence (top) and OR with 95% CI for prevalence of IHG-I (bottom) by sex within age strata. E, HRs with 95% CI of developing AIDS (1987 criteria51) in HIV+ participants by entry IHG. H, High; L, low. F,Top-left: IHG prevalence by age strata. PIHG-I and PIHG-IV is for the proportion of IHG-I vs rest and IHG-IV vs rest across age strata. Top-right: Age strata distribution by IHG subgrades. Middle-left and right: OR with 95% CI for hospitalization. OR by age strata (left) adjusted by baseline IHG status and OR by baseline IHG status (right) adjusted by age strata. Bottom: Median values of CD4+ and CD8+ counts and CD4:CD8 ratio by hospitalization status (yes/no) and (left) age strata and (right) IHG subgrades. F, Female; M, male. †P = .06. ∗P < .05. ∗∗P < .01. ∗∗∗P < .001.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Association of IHGs at presentation (baseline) with hospitalization status and reconstitution of IHG during convalescence in the COVID-19 cohort. A,Top: IHG prevalence at baseline by hospitalized (H) and nonhospitalized (NH) status and age strata. Bottom: OR with 95% CI for having IHG-I or IHG-II at baseline by hospitalization status. Percent hospitalized shown by age strata. B, Paired IHG distributions at baseline and during convalescence among 206 COVID-19 survivors overall and stratified by age. C, Distribution of IHG subgrades (as in Fig 1, B) in HIV-seronegative persons in the COVID-19 cohort categorized as hospitalized (H) and nonhospitalized (NH). D, Distribution of IHGs reconstituted during convalescence by baseline IHG status. E, The probability (with 95% confidence bands) of hospitalization according to age and baseline IHG. Overall IHG-IV was used in this model because all patients with IHG-IVc were hospitalized and numbers of patients in the other IHG-IV subgrades were small. †P = .07. ∗P < .05. ∗∗P < .01. ∗∗∗P < .001.
Fig 3
Fig 3
COVID-19 outcomes by baseline IHG status. A,Top 3 plots: Kaplan-Meier curves for 30-day all-cause mortality from days since presentation by baseline IHG status (top), IHG-I and IHG-II subgrades (middle), and IHG-I and IHG-IV subgrades (bottom). Middle: Number at risk (No.) indicates patients who had not died or been censored before that time point. Bottom: Age-adjusted HRs (aHRs) with 95% CIs (reference: IHG-I). B,Top 3 plots: Cumulative hospital discharge estimates within 30 days of presentation among hospitalized patients by baseline IHG status (top), IHG-I and IHG-II subgrades (middle), and IHG-I and IHG-IV subgrades (bottom). Middle: Number at risk (No.) indicates patients who had not been discharged or been censored before that time point. Bottom: Age-adjusted RRs (aRRs) with 95% CIs (reference: IHG-I). C, Peak plasma IL-6 levels by hospitalization status, survivorship status in hospitalized patients, and baseline IHG status. D, Levels of SARS-CoV-2 viral transcript burden proxied by log10-normalized counts of SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein “N” gene sequence in nasal transcriptomes of hospitalized patients by baseline IHG status, depicted as mean ± SEM (bands). H, Hospitalized; H-S, hospitalized survivor; H-NS, hospitalized nonsurvivor; NH, nonhospitalized; SEM, standard error of mean.
Fig 4
Fig 4
Beneficial and detrimental traits in the COVID-19 cohort and the FHS. A,Center: HRs (95% CI) of mortality in the COVID-19 cohort (30-day) and the FHS (survival over 9 years adjusted by age as a continuous variable). HRs are depicted for 34 of the 52 traits identified in baseline peripheral blood transcriptome from 48 patients that were significantly associated with progressive COVID-19. GO-BP terms (left) were classified as detrimental (#1-26) or beneficial (#27-34) traits, and representative genes (right) in each trait are shown. The association of these traits was analyzed in the FHS for 9-year survival. Forest plots are categorized and color-coded to represent shared and unique significant associations (FDR < 0.1) in these 2 cohorts. Fig E9 and Table E8 depict the entire list of traits. B, Gene expression scores for a representative detrimental and beneficial trait in baseline peripheral blood transcriptomes (n = 48) by hospitalization and survivorship status (NH-S, nonhospitalized survivors; H-S, hospitalized survivors; NS, nonsurvivors), age strata, and baseline IHG status. FDR, False-discovery rate.

Comment in

Similar articles

  • Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses.
    Jefferson T, Dooley L, Ferroni E, Al-Ansary LA, van Driel ML, Bawazeer GA, Jones MA, Hoffmann TC, Clark J, Beller EM, Glasziou PP, Conly JM. Jefferson T, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 30;1(1):CD006207. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 36715243 Free PMC article.
  • The effect of sample site and collection procedure on identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
    Davenport C, Arevalo-Rodriguez I, Mateos-Haro M, Berhane S, Dinnes J, Spijker R, Buitrago-Garcia D, Ciapponi A, Takwoingi Y, Deeks JJ, Emperador D, Leeflang MMG, Van den Bruel A; Cochrane COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Accuracy Group. Davenport C, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 16;12(12):CD014780. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014780. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 39679851 Free PMC article.
  • Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS-CoV-2.
    Fox T, Geppert J, Dinnes J, Scandrett K, Bigio J, Sulis G, Hettiarachchi D, Mathangasinghe Y, Weeratunga P, Wickramasinghe D, Bergman H, Buckley BS, Probyn K, Sguassero Y, Davenport C, Cunningham J, Dittrich S, Emperador D, Hooft L, Leeflang MM, McInnes MD, Spijker R, Struyf T, Van den Bruel A, Verbakel JY, Takwoingi Y, Taylor-Phillips S, Deeks JJ; Cochrane COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Accuracy Group. Fox T, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD013652. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013652.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36394900 Free PMC article.
  • Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic.
    Krishnaratne S, Littlecott H, Sell K, Burns J, Rabe JE, Stratil JM, Litwin T, Kreutz C, Coenen M, Geffert K, Boger AH, Movsisyan A, Kratzer S, Klinger C, Wabnitz K, Strahwald B, Verboom B, Rehfuess E, Biallas RL, Jung-Sievers C, Voss S, Pfadenhauer LM. Krishnaratne S, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 17;1(1):CD015029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015029. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 2;5:CD015029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015029.pub2. PMID: 35037252 Free PMC article. Updated.
  • Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
    Dinnes J, Sharma P, Berhane S, van Wyk SS, Nyaaba N, Domen J, Taylor M, Cunningham J, Davenport C, Dittrich S, Emperador D, Hooft L, Leeflang MM, McInnes MD, Spijker R, Verbakel JY, Takwoingi Y, Taylor-Phillips S, Van den Bruel A, Deeks JJ; Cochrane COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Accuracy Group. Dinnes J, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 22;7(7):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35866452 Free PMC article.

Cited by

References

    1. Gupta S., Hayek S.S., Wang W., Chan L., Mathews K.S., Melamed M.L., et al. Factors associated with death in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in the US. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180:1436–1447. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grasselli G., Greco M., Zanella A., Albano G., Antonelli M., Bellani G., et al. Risk factors associated with mortality among patients with COVID-19 in intensive care units in Lombardy, Italy. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180:1345–1355. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cunningham J.W., Vaduganathan M., Claggett B.L., Jering K.S., Bhatt A.S., Rosenthal N., et al. Clinical outcomes in young US adults hospitalized with COVID-19. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;181:379–381. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Team CC-R Severe outcomes among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)—United States, February 12-March 16, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69:343–346. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Takahashi T., Ellingson M.K., Wong P., Israelow B., Lucas C., Klein J., et al. Sex differences in immune responses that underlie COVID-19 disease outcomes. Nature. 2020;588:315–320. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms