Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar;17(2):e12423.
doi: 10.1111/opn.12423. Epub 2021 Sep 12.

Ambulance clinicians' attitudes to older patients' self-determination when the patient has impaired decision-making ability: A Delphi study

Anders Svensson  1   2   3 , Anders Bremer  1   2   4 , Andreas Rantala  2   5   6 , Henrik Andersson  1   2   7 , Scott Devenish  8 , Julia Williams  9 , Mats Holmberg  1   2   10   11
Affiliations

Ambulance clinicians' attitudes to older patients' self-determination when the patient has impaired decision-making ability: A Delphi study

Anders Svensson et al. Int J Older People Nurs. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: The proportion of older people is increasing and reflects in the demand on ambulance services (AS). Patients can be more vulnerable and increasingly dependent, especially when their decision-making ability is impaired. Self-determination in older people has a positive relation to quality of life and can raise ethical conflicts in AS. Hence, the aim of this study was to empirically explore attitudes among Swedish ambulance clinicians (ACs) regarding older patients' self-determination in cases where patients have impaired decision-making ability, and who are in urgent need of care.

Materials and methods: An explorative design was adopted. A Delphi technique was used, comprising four rounds, involving a group (N = 31) of prehospital emergency nurses (n = 14), registered nurses (n = 10) and emergency medical technicians (n = 7). Focus group conversations (Round 1) and questionnaires (Rounds 2-4) generated data. Round 1 was analysed using manifest content analysis, which ultimately resulted in the creation of discrete items. Each item was rated with a five-point Likert scale together with free-text answers. Consensus (≥70%) was calculated by trichotomising the Likert scale.

Results: Round 1 identified 108 items which were divided into four categories: (1) attitudes regarding the patient (n = 35), (2) attitudes regarding the patient relationship (n = 8), (3) attitudes regarding oneself and one's colleagues (n = 45), and (4) attitudes regarding other involved factors (n = 20). In Rounds 2-4, one item was identified in the free text from Round 2, generating a total of 109 items. After four rounds, 72 items (62%) reached consensus.

Conclusions: The findings highlight the complexity of ACs' attitudes towards older patients' self-determination. The respect of older patients' self-determination is challenged by the patient, other healthcare personnel, significant others and/or colleagues. The study provided a unique opportunity to explore self-determination and shared decision-making. AS have to provide continued ethical training, for example to increase the use of simulation-based training or moral case deliberations in order to strengthen the ACs' moral abilities within their professional practice.

Implications for practice: Ambulance services must develop opportunities to provide continued training within this topic. One option would be to increase the use of simulation-based training, focusing on ethical aspects of the care. Another option might be to facilitate moral case deliberations to strengthen the ACs' abilities to manage these issues while being able to share experiences with peers. These types of interventions should illuminate the importance of the topic for the individual AC, which, in turn, may strengthen and develop the caring abilities within an integrated care team.

Keywords: ambulance clinicians; decision-making ability; ethics; older patients; patient autonomy; prehospital emergency nurses; self-determination.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Aronsson, K., Björkdahl, I., & Wireklint Sundström, B. (2014). Prehospital emergency care for patients with suspected hip fractures after falling-older patients’ experiences. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 23(21-22), 3115-3123. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12550
    1. Bölenius, K., Lämås, K., Sandman, P., Lindkvist, M., & Edvardsson, D. (2019). Perceptions of self-determination and quality of life among Swedish home care recipients - a cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatrics, 19(1), 142. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1145-8
    1. Boltz, M., Parke, B., Shuluk, J., Capezuti, E., & Galvin, J. E. (2013). Care of the older adult in the emergency department: Nurses views of the pressing issues. Gerontologist, 53(3), 441-453. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnt004
    1. Brataas, H. V., Bjugan, H., Wille, T., & Hellzen, O. (2010). Experiences of day care and collaboration among people with mild dementia. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 19(19-20), 2839-2848. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03270.x
    1. Bremer, A. (2016). Dagens ambulanssjukvård [Today’s ambulance care]. In B.-O. Suserud, & L. Lundberg (Eds.), Prehospital akutsjukvård [Prehospital emergency care]. 2nd ed., (pp. 48-61). Liber.

LinkOut - more resources