Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug;34(3):217-224.
doi: 10.2337/ds20-0072. Epub 2021 Aug 18.

Cardiovascular Outcomes Trials of Incretin-Based Therapies

Affiliations

Cardiovascular Outcomes Trials of Incretin-Based Therapies

Tina K Thethi et al. Diabetes Spectr. 2021 Aug.

Abstract

The cardiovascular (CV) safety of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists has been established in robust cardiovascular outcomes trials (CVOTs) in patients with type 2 diabetes at high CV risk. The GLP-1 receptor agonists liraglutide, dulaglutide, and injectable semaglutide demonstrated a significant CV benefit in these trials and now have indications to reduce the risk of major adverse CV events, including CV death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in adult patients with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease or high CV risk (dulaglutide). The dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors have also demonstrated CV safety in dedicated CVOTs but have not been associated with any CV benefit. Guidelines for the treatment of type 2 diabetes have evolved from a glucocentric focus to one that now focuses on reducing overall CV risk by personalizing therapy and using drugs such as GLP-1 receptor agonists with proven CV benefits.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Results from CVOTs of GLP-1 receptor agonists. A) Primary composite MACE (for superiority). B) Cardiovascular death. C) Hospitalization for HF. D) Renal outcomes, including macroalbuminuria. GLP-1 RA, GLP-1 receptor agonist.

References

    1. Dailey G. Overall mortality in diabetes mellitus: where do we stand today? Diabetes Technol Ther 2011;13(Suppl. 1):S65–S74 - PubMed
    1. Tancredi M, Rosengren A, Svensson A-M, et al. . Excess mortality among persons with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2015;373:1720–1732 - PubMed
    1. Benjamin EJ, Virani SS, Callaway CW, et al. .; American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee . Heart disease and stroke statistics—2018 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2018;137:e67–e492 - PubMed
    1. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group . Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998;352:837–853 - PubMed
    1. Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Study Group; Gerstein HC, Miller ME, Byington RP, et al. . Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008;358:2545–2559 - PMC - PubMed