Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug;34(3):257-267.
doi: 10.2337/ds20-0040. Epub 2021 Mar 9.

Health Care Providers' Utilization of and Perspectives on Mobile Health Technology for Diabetes and Pregnancy Support

Jenise Jackson  1 , Karolina Leziak  1 , Charlotte M Niznik  1 , Lynn M Yee  1
Affiliations

Health Care Providers' Utilization of and Perspectives on Mobile Health Technology for Diabetes and Pregnancy Support

Jenise Jackson et al. Diabetes Spectr. 2021 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: Mobile health (mHealth) technology can be an effective tool to deliver behavioral interventions to improve health outcomes for individuals with diabetes. However, there is limited evidence on mHealth for pregnant women managing diabetes or for the role of health care providers (HCPs) in delivering mHealth tools. To prepare for the development of a pregnancy-specific mHealth intervention for diabetes, we sought to understand HCPs' acceptance, utilization, and design recommendations for how mHealth technology can best be used to support the management of diabetes during pregnancy.

Methods: Focus groups and individual interviews were conducted with clinical HCPs (obstetricians, nurses, diabetes educators, dietitians, and lactation counselors) who care for low-income pregnant women with diabetes. Data were analyzed using the constant comparative method.

Results: Participants (n = 29) generated five themes and 14 subthemes. Knowledge and acceptance themes included utilization of mobile resources and barriers to HCPs' adoption. Knowledge of popular pregnancy applications (apps) dominated, while familiarity with and use of diabetes apps varied by profession and proximity to continued education. Technology adoption barriers included lack of credibility, dependence on Internet resources, and reliance on knowledge networks. Design themes addressed user-centered design, responsive and practical education, and clinical integration. Clinicians recommended patient-participatory design, customizable features, data-tracking features, motivational feedback, and bidirectional communication capabilities.

Conclusion: Although HCPs strongly embraced mHealth tools as an adjunct to obstetric care for women with diabetes, they also expressed limited knowledge and apprehension about patient engagement. HCP recommendations and concerns must critically inform the development of meaningful tools for this population.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bose-Brill S, Freeman TE, Miles L, Prater L, Chang M-W, Bower JK. Bridging the gap in gestational diabetes: an interdisciplinary approach to improving GDM using a chronic care–based clinical framework. Am J Perinatol 2020;37:970–974 - PubMed
    1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics . ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 201: pregestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol 2018;132:e228–e248 - PubMed
    1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists . ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 190: gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol 2018;131:e49–e64 - PubMed
    1. Balani J, Hyer SL, Rodin DA, Shehata H. Pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes treated with metformin or insulin: a case-control study. Diabet Med 2009;26:798–802 - PubMed
    1. Crowther CA, Hiller JE, Moss JR, McPhee AJ, Jeffries WS; Australian Carbohydrate Intolerance Study in Pregnant Women (ACHOIS) Trial Group . Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med 2005;352:2477–2486 - PubMed