Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Sep 1:11:51-60.
doi: 10.2147/DNND.S317865. eCollection 2021.

Effect of Ankle Joint Mobilization with Movement on Range of Motion, Balance and Gait Function in Chronic Stroke Survivors: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Affiliations
Review

Effect of Ankle Joint Mobilization with Movement on Range of Motion, Balance and Gait Function in Chronic Stroke Survivors: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Abayneh Alamer et al. Degener Neurol Neuromuscul Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Ankle joint mobilization with movement has been speculated to be an important intervention for enhancing range of motion, balance, and gait functions in chronic stroke survivors. Nonetheless, there is a scarcity of recent conclusive evidence that evaluates its efficacy in chronic stroke patients. The purpose of this review was to synthesize existing evidence on the efficacy of mobilization with movement therapy on range of motion, balance, and gait performance in subjects after stroke.

Methods: A comprehensive systematic search of literature was performed using the following databases: PubMed/Medline, CINAHL, AMED, PEDro, Cochrane Library, and Scopus. Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale was used to evaluate the methodological quality of included trials. The primary outcome measures of this review were dorsiflexion range of motion (DF-ROM), and Berg balance scale (BBS). This review was reported in accordance with PRISMA statement guidelines. Due to variations in relevant trials, meta-analysis was not carried out.

Results and conclusions: Seven randomized controlled trials with a total of 224 subjects were analyzed. Evidence of overall quality was graded from moderate to high. This review found that mobilization with movement therapy could be an alternative rehabilitative intervention for subjects with chronic stroke to increase range of motion, balance, and gait ability. However, the evidence remains preliminary due to the small number of participants. Large-scale RCTs in the future are warranted to investigate the efficacy of mobilization with movement in subgroups of chronic stroke subjects.

Keywords: Mulligan’s mobilization with movement; balance; chronic stroke; gait; range of motion; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest for this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram.Notes: Adapted from Liberati A, Altman D, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2009;62(10)e1-e34. Creative Commons.

References

    1. O’dwyer N, Ada L, Neilson P. Spasticity and muscle contracture following stroke. Brain. 1996;119(5):1737–1749. doi:10.1093/brain/119.5.1737 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Watkins C, Leathley MJ, Gregson JM, et al. Prevalence of spasticity post stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16(5):515–522. doi:10.1191/0269215502cr512oa - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chung SG, van Rey E, Bai Z, et al. Biomechanic changes in passive properties of hemiplegic ankles with spastic hypertonia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(10):1638–1646. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2003.11.041 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thilmann A, Fellows S, Ross H. Biomechanical changes at the ankle joint after stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1991;54(2):134–139. doi:10.1136/jnnp.54.2.134 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kluding PM, Santos M. Effects of ankle joint mobilizations in adults poststroke: a pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(3):449–456. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.12.005 - DOI - PubMed