Pre- and Interhospital Workflow Times for Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke Transferred for Endovasvular Thrombectomy
- PMID: 34512538
- PMCID: PMC8428365
- DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.730250
Pre- and Interhospital Workflow Times for Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke Transferred for Endovasvular Thrombectomy
Abstract
Background: Patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke are often initially admitted to a primary stroke center (PSC) and subsequently transferred to a comprehensive stroke center (CSC) for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). This interhospital transfer delays initiation of EVT. To identify potential workflow improvements, we analyzed pre- and interhospital time metrics for patients with LVO stroke who were transferred from a PSC for EVT. Methods: We used data from the regional emergency medical services and our EVT registry. We included patients with LVO stroke who were transferred from three nearby PSCs for EVT (2014-2021). The time interval between first alarm and arrival at the CSC (call-to-CSC time) and other time metrics were calculated. We analyzed associations between various clinical and workflow-related factors and call-to-CSC time, using multivariable linear regression. Results: We included 198 patients with LVO stroke. Mean age was 70 years (±14.9), median baseline NIHSS was 14 (IQR: 9-18), 136/198 (69%) were treated with intravenous thrombolysis, and 135/198 (68%) underwent EVT. Median call-to-CSC time was 162 min (IQR: 137-190). In 133/155 (86%) cases, the ambulance for transfer to the CSC was dispatched with the highest level of urgency. This was associated with shorter call-to-CSC time (adjusted β [95% CI]: -27.6 min [-51.2 to -3.9]). No clinical characteristics were associated with call-to-CSC time. Conclusion: In patients transferred from a PSC for EVT, median call-to-CSC time was over 2.5 h. The highest level of urgency for dispatch of ambulances for EVT transfers should be used, as this clearly decreases time to treatment.
Keywords: acute ischemic stroke; endovascular thrombectomy; interhospital; large vessel occlusion; prehospital/EMS; time to treatment; workflow.
Copyright © 2021 van Meenen, Riedijk, Stolp, van der Veen, Halkes, van der Ree, Majoie, Roos, Smeekes and Coutinho.
Conflict of interest statement
CM reports grants from CVON/Dutch Heart Foundation, European Commission, TWIN Foundation, Stryker, and Health Evaluation Netherlands, all outside the submitted work (paid to institution), and is shareholder of Nico.lab, a company that focuses on the use of artificial intelligence for medical image analysis. YR is a minor shareholder of Nico.lab. JC received unrelated research support from the Dutch Heart Foundation, Bayer, Boehringer, and Medtronic. All fees were paid to his employer. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Froehler MT, Saver JL, Zaidat OO, Jahan R, Aziz-Sultan MA, Klucznik RP, et al. . Interhospital transfer before thrombectomy is associated with delayed treatment and worse outcome in the STRATIS registry (systematic evaluation of patients treated with neurothrombectomy devices for acute ischemic stroke). Circulation. (2017) 136:2311–21. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028920 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
