Protective effect of extracorporeal membrane pulmonary oxygenation combined with cardiopulmonary resuscitation on post-resuscitation lung injury
- PMID: 34512828
- PMCID: PMC8390345
- DOI: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2021.04.009
Protective effect of extracorporeal membrane pulmonary oxygenation combined with cardiopulmonary resuscitation on post-resuscitation lung injury
Abstract
Background: Cardiac arrest (CA) is a critical condition that is a concern to healthcare workers. Comparative studies on extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) and conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR) technologies have shown that ECPR is superior to CCPR. However, there is a lack of studies that compare the protective effects of these two resuscitative methods on organs. Therefore, we aim to perform experiments in swine models of ventricular fibrillation-induced CA to study whether the early application of ECPR has advantages over CCPR in the lung injury and to explore the protective mechanism of ECPR on the post-resuscitation pulmonary injury.
Methods: Sixteen male swine were randomized to CCPR (CCPR; n=8; CCPR alone) and ECPR (ECPR; n=8; extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with CCPR) groups, with the restoration of spontaneous circulation at 6 hours as an endpoint.
Results: For the two groups, the survival rates between the two groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05), the blood and lung biomarkers were statistically significant (P<0.05), and the extravascular lung water and pulmonary vascular permeability index were statistically significant (P<0.01). Compared with the ECPR group, electron microscopy revealed mostly vacuolated intracellular alveolar type II lamellar bodies and a fuzzy lamellar structure with widening and blurring of the blood-gas barrier in the CCPR group.
Conclusions: ECPR may have pulmonary protective effects, possibly related to the regulation of alveolar surface-active proteins and mitigated oxidative stress response post-resuscitation.
Keywords: Alveolar surface-active protein; Cardiac arrest; Oxidative stress injury; Pulmonary edema; Swine.
Copyright: © World Journal of Emergency Medicine.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interests: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest regarding this article.
Figures
References
-
- Lin MH, Peng LN, Chen LK, Chen TJ, Hwang SJ. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation for hospital inpatients in Taiwan:an 8-year nationwide survey. Resuscitation. 2012;83(3):343–6. - PubMed
-
- Nehme Z, Andrew E, Bernard S, Smith K. Impact of cardiopulmonary resuscitation duration on survival from paramedic witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrests:an observational study. Resuscitation. 2016;100:25–31. - PubMed
-
- Chen YS, Chao A, Yu HY, Ko WJ, Wu IH, Chen RJC, et al. Analysis and results of prolonged resuscitation in cardiac arrest patients rescued by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41(2):197–203. - PubMed
-
- Chen YS, Lin JW, Yu HY, Ko WJ, Jerng JS, Chang WT, et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation with assisted extracorporeal life-support versus conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults with in-hospital cardiac arrest:an observational study and propensity analysis. Lancet. 2008;372(9638):554–61. - PubMed
-
- Ortega-Deballon I, Hornby L, Shemie SD, Bhanji F, Guadagno E. Extracorporeal resuscitation for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in adults:a systematic review of international practices and outcomes. Resuscitation. 2016;101:12–20. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources