Outcomes of Implant Removal and Capsulectomy for Breast Implant Illness in 248 Patients
- PMID: 34513545
- PMCID: PMC8423394
- DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003813
Outcomes of Implant Removal and Capsulectomy for Breast Implant Illness in 248 Patients
Abstract
Background: Breast implant illness (BII) is a term popularized by social media to describe systemic symptoms that patients ascribe to their breast implants. Though the concept of implants as an underlying cause for a systemic illness remains controversial, few studies have delineated the implant characteristics, capsular histology, and outcomes of patients who undergo explantation for BII.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the demographics, presenting symptoms, outcomes, capsular histology, and culture results of all women who presented to the senior author with symptoms attributed to BII and underwent breast implant removal with capsulectomy from August 2016 to February 2020. Chi-square and logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate association between implant type, composition, and findings of inflammation on capsule pathology.
Results: Among 248 patients, 111 (23%) capsules demonstrated inflammatory changes on permanent pathology. Capsular inflammation was independently associated with silicone versus saline (right odds ratio [OR] = 2.18 [1.16-4.11], P = 0.016, left OR = 2.35 [1.08-5.12], P = 0.03) and textured versus smooth implants (right OR = 2.18 [1.16-4.11], P = 0.016, left OR = 2.25 [1.17-4.31], P = 0.01). Silicone material was present in the capsules of 12 patients (4.8%). Fourteen patients had positive cultures. There was one pneumothorax (0.4%), three hematomas requiring evacuation (1%), and two DVTs (0.8%). Of 228 patients, 206 (90.4%) reported high satisfaction with the outcome of the procedure.
Conclusions: In a large cohort of BII patients, we found that capsular inflammation is significantly associated with silicone and textured implants. Implant removal with capsulectomy can be safely performed in patients with BII with a low complication rate and high patient satisfaction.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure: The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article.
Figures




References
-
- The American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS). Breast Implant Illness—Frequently Asked Questions/Talking Points. Available at https://www.surgery.org/sites/default/files/BreastImplantIllness_8-21-20.... Accessed February 16, 2020.
-
- Magnusson MR, Cooter RD, Rakhorst H, et al. . Breast implant illness: a way forward. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;143(3S A Review of Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma):74S–81S. - PubMed
-
- Healing Breast Implant Illness Facebook Group. Available at https://www.facebook.com/groups/Healingbreastimplantillness/. Accessed February 16th, 2020.
-
- Tang SYQ, Israel JS, Afifi AM. Breast implant illness: symptoms, patient concerns, and the power of social media. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140:765e–766e. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources