Distribution, Prevalence, and Causative Agents of Fungal Keratitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (1990 to 2020)
- PMID: 34513726
- PMCID: PMC8428535
- DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.698780
Distribution, Prevalence, and Causative Agents of Fungal Keratitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (1990 to 2020)
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to provide an overview of the prevalence, distribution, and causative agents of fungal keratitis.
Methods: All the articles with data on the prevalence of fungal keratitis among various patient groups from January 1, 1990 to May 27, 2020 were retrieved through a systematic search in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Data were extracted, and the pooled estimated prevalence of fungal keratitis, yeast/mold infection, the spectrum and frequency of various causative agents, and the pooled estimated prevalence of mixed infections were calculated in general and in various countries (wherever possible) using meta-analysis.
Results: From 11,235 articles retrieved in the primary search step, 169 met the inclusion criteria. The 169 eligible articles were divided into six groups and analyzed separately. The pooled prevalence of fungal keratitis was variable with values ranging from 0.05% among postkeratoplasty patients to 43.01% among patients with a clinical suspicion of fungal keratitis. There was also a country-dependent variation in the prevalence (Paraguay: 50.1% (95% CI, 35.11, 65.00); Ireland: 1.1% (95% CI, 0.03, 6.04)). Except for postkeratoplasty cases (yeast: 51.80%), in all patient groups, molds were more common than yeasts. Although more than 50 distinct species of fungi have been found to cause fungal keratitis, Fusarium species followed by Aspergillus species were the most common causes of the disease. In general, 9.29% (95% CI, 6.52, 12.38) of fungal keratitis cases were mixed with bacterial agents.
Conclusion: The prevalence of fungal keratitis can vary dramatically depending on the patient groups and geographical origin; however, the dominant causative agents are generally similar.
Keywords: Aspergillus; Fusarium; corneal ulcer; fungal keratitis; keratomycosis; meta-analysis; yeasts.
Copyright © 2021 Ahmadikia, Aghaei Gharehbolagh, Fallah, Naeimi Eshkaleti, Malekifar, Rahsepar, Getso, Sharma and Mahmoudi.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Aldave A. J., Dematteo J., Glasser D. B., Tu E. Y., Iliakis B., Nordlund M. L., et al. (2013). Report of the Eye Bank Association of America Medical Advisory Board Subcommittee on Fungal Infection After Corneal Transplantation. Cornea 32, 149–154. - PubMed
-
- Bourcier T., Sauer A., Dory A., Denis J., Sabou M. (2017). Fungal Keratitis. J. Fr. Ophtalmol. 40, e307–e313. - PubMed
-
- Brown L., Leck A. K., Gichangi M., Burton M. J., Denning D. W. (2020). The Global Incidence and Diagnosis of Fungal Keratitis. Lancet Infect. Dis. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
