Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug 26:9:724239.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.724239. eCollection 2021.

900 MHz Radiofrequency Field Induces Mitochondrial Unfolded Protein Response in Mouse Bone Marrow Stem Cells

Affiliations

900 MHz Radiofrequency Field Induces Mitochondrial Unfolded Protein Response in Mouse Bone Marrow Stem Cells

Wen Xie et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Objective: To examine whether exposure of mouse bone marrow stromal cells (BMSC) to 900 MHz radiofrequency fields used in mobile communication devices can induce mitochondrial unfolded protein response (UPRmt). Methods: BMSCs were exposed to continuous wave 900 MHz radiofrequency fields (RF) at 120 μW/cm2 power intensity for 4 h/d for 5 consecutive days. Cells in sham group (SH) were cultured in RF exposure system, but without RF radiation. The positive control cells were irradiated with 6 Gy X-ray at a dose rate of 1.103 Gy/min (XR). To inhibit the upstream molecular JNK2 of UPRmt, cells in siRNA + RF, and siRNA + XR group were also pretreated with 100 nM siRNA-JNK2 for 48 h before RF/XR exposure. Thirty minutes, 4 h, and 24 h post-RF/XR exposure, cells were collected, the level of ROS was measured with flow cytometry, the expression levels of UPRmt-related proteins were detected using western blot analysis. Results: Compared with Sham group, the level of ROS in RF and XR group was significantly increased 30 min and 4 h post-RF/XR exposure (P < 0.05), however, the RF/XR-induced increase of ROS level reversed 24 h post-RF/XR exposure. Compared with Sham group, the expression levels of HSP10/HSP60/ClpP proteins in cells of RF and XR group increased significantly 30 min and 4 h post-RF/XR exposure (P < 0.05), however, the RF/XR-induced increase of HSP10/HSP60/ClpP protein levels reversed 24 h post-RF exposure. After interfering with siRNA-JNK2, the RF/XR exposures could not induce the increase of HSP10/HSP60/ClpP protein levels any more. Conclusions: The exposure of 900 MHz RF at 120 μW/cm2 power flux density could increase ROS level and activate a transient UPRmt in BMSC cells. Mitochondrial homeostasis in term of protein folding ability is restored 24 h post-RF exposure. Exposure to RF in our experimental condition did not cause permanent and severe mitochondrial dysfunctions. However, the detailed underlying molecular mechanism of RF-induced UPRmt remains to be further studied.

Keywords: heat shock protein; microwave; mitochondria; radiofrequency fields; reactive oxygen species; unfolded protein response.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ROS levels in BMSCs at 30 min, 4 h, and 24 h post exposure. SH, Sham; RF, RF-exposed; XR, X-rays irradiated. RF and XR vs. SH: *P < 0.05; XR vs. RF: #P < 0.05.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The expression level of JNK2 mRNA after siRNA transfection for 48 h. siRNA vs. Sham: *P < 0.05.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Protein levels of HSP10, HSP60, ClpP in BMSCs after exposure. (A) Western blot analysis of HSP10, HSP60, ClpP in BMSCs at 30 min post exposure. (B) Relative expression on level of HSP10, HSP60, ClpP protein at 30 min post exposure. (C) Western blot analysis of HSP10, HSP60, ClpP in BMSCs at 4 h post exposure. (D) Relative expression on level of HSP10, HSP60, ClpP protein at 4 h post exposure. (E) Western blot analysis of HSP10, HSP60, ClpP in BMSCs at 24 h post exposure. (F) Relative expression on level of HSP10, HSP60, ClpP protein at 24 h post exposure. SH, Sham; RF, RF-exposed; XR, X-rays irradiated; si + SH, siRNA + Sham; si + RF, siRNA + RF-exposed; si + XR, siRNA + X-rays irradiated. RF and XR vs. SH: *P < 0.05; si + RF vs. RF: #P < 0.05.

References

    1. Yang L, Zhang C, Chen Z, Li C, Wu T. Functional and network analyses of human exposure to long-term evolution signal. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. (2021) 28:5755–73. 10.1007/s11356-020-10728-w - DOI - PubMed
    1. Haynes CM, Fiorese CJ, Lin YF. Evaluating and responding to mitochondrial dysfunction: the mitochondrial unfolded-protein response and beyond. Trends Cell Biol. (2013) 23:311–8. 10.1016/j.tcb.2013.02.002 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Haynes CM, Ron D. The mitochondrial UPR - protecting organelle protein homeostasis. J Cell Sci. (2010) 123:3849–55. 10.1242/jcs.075119 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Medinas DB, Hetz C. Protein homeostasis: modeling UPR adaptive responses. Nat Chem Biol. (2014) 10:879–80. 10.1038/nchembio.1653 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Quiros PM, Mottis A, Auwerx J. Mitonuclear communication in homeostasis and stress. Nat Rev Mol Cell Bio. (2016) 17:213–26. 10.1038/nrm.2016.23 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types