Gendered Attributions of Blame and Failure to Protect in Child Welfare Responses to Sexual Abuse: A Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis
- PMID: 34515580
- PMCID: PMC8941713
- DOI: 10.1177/10778012211024263
Gendered Attributions of Blame and Failure to Protect in Child Welfare Responses to Sexual Abuse: A Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis
Abstract
Gender-based relations of power and attributions of blame for child sexual abuse have been longstanding in child welfare policy and practice. Nonoffending mothers continue to be ascribed responsibility through the ideologically and institutionally entrenched doctrine of failure to protect. Feminist critical discourse analysis was used to (a) expose and disrupt dominant discourses of gender, motherhood, and risk that operate to construct and reinforce notions of blame and failure to protect, as enacted by way of child welfare text in context; and (b) build a credible case for social and organizational change grounded in an alternative discourse with greater explanatory power. Progressive avenues for resistance, negotiation, and transformation are proposed.
Keywords: child sexual abuse; child welfare; critical discourse analysis; failure to protect; nonoffending mothers.
Conflict of interest statement
References
-
- Alaggia R. (2002). Balancing acts: Reconceptualizing support in maternal response to intra-familial child sexual abuse. Clinical Social Work, 30(1), 41–56. 10.1023/A:1014274311428 - DOI
-
- Alaggia R., Jenney A., Mazzucca J., Redmond M. (2007). In whose best interest? A Canadian case study of the impact of child welfare policies in cases of domestic violence. Brief Therapy and Crisis Intervention, 7(4), 275–290. 10.1093/brief-treatment/mhm018 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
