Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2021 Sep;8(2):e001735.
doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2021-001735.

Impact of risk factors for major cardiovascular diseases: a comparison of life-time observational and Mendelian randomisation findings

Affiliations
Observational Study

Impact of risk factors for major cardiovascular diseases: a comparison of life-time observational and Mendelian randomisation findings

Lars Lind et al. Open Heart. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Background: This study compared the strength and causality of associations between major risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and the four major CVDs: myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, heart failure and atrial fibrillation. Both a long-term follow-up in an observational cohort and Mendelian randomisation (MR) were used for this aim.

Methods: In the Uppsala Longitudinal Study of Adult Men study, 2322 men, all aged 50 years, were assessed for CVD risk factors and then followed for four decades regarding incident CVDs. The two-sample MR part used public available Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) data.

Results: In multivariate analyses, systolic blood pressure was overall by far the most important risk factor, since it was related to all four CVDs, both in observational and MR analyses. Body mass index was the second most overall important risk factor, being linked to all four CVDs, except ischaemic stroke, both in observational and MR analyses. Smoking was an important risk factor for ischaemic stroke and heart failure, both in observational and MR analyses, while low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol mainly was related to myocardial infarction. Diabetes was mainly a causal risk factor for incident myocardial infarction and heart failure. Neither HDL-cholesterol nor triglycerides were of major importance as risk factors in these multivariable models.

Conclusion: By combining long-term observational data with genetic data, we show that the impact and causal role of specific established cardiovascular risk factors varies between different major CVDs. Systolic blood pressure was causally related to all four cardiovascular outcomes and was therefore, overall, the most important risk factor.

Keywords: atrial fibrillation; coronary artery disease; epidemiology; heart failure; stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relationships between traditional risk factors and incident myocardial infarction. Left is results from the ULSAM longitudinal study with 40 years follow-up and right is results from two-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR). Results are given both for a univariate (risk factors analysed one by one) and a multivariate model (including all risk factors in the same model). BMI, body mass index; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; IVW, inverse-variance weighted; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; SBP, systolic blood pressure; ULSAM, Uppsala Longitudinal Study of Adult Men.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relationships between traditional risk factors and incident ischaemic stroke. Left is results from the ULSAM longitudinal study with 40 years follow-up and right is results from two-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR). Results are given both for a univariate (risk factors analysed one by one) and a multivariate model (including all risk factors in the same model). BMI, body mass index; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; SBP, systolic blood pressure; ULSAM, Uppsala Longitudinal Study of Adult Men.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relationships between traditional risk factors and incident heart failure. Left is results from the ULSAM longitudinal study with 40 years follow-up and right is results from two-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR). Results are given both for a univariate (risk factors analysed one by one) and a multivariate model (including all risk factors in the same model). BMI, body mass index; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; SBP, systolic blood pressure; ULSAM, Uppsala Longitudinal Study of Adult Men.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Relationships between traditional risk factors and incident atrial fibrillation. Left is results from the ULSAM longitudinal study with 40 years follow-up and right is results from two-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR). Results are given both for a univariate (risk factors analysed one by one) and a multivariate model (including all risk factors in the same model). BMI, body mass index; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; SBP, systolic blood pressure; ULSAM, Uppsala Longitudinal Study of Adult Men.

References

    1. Anderson KM, Odell PM, Wilson PW, et al. Cardiovascular disease risk profiles. Am Heart J 1991;121:293–8. 10.1016/0002-8703(91)90861-B - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wilson PW, D'Agostino RB, Levy D, et al. Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation 1998;97:1837–47. 10.1161/01.CIR.97.18.1837 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wolf PA, D'Agostino RB, Belanger AJ, et al. Probability of stroke: a risk profile from the framingham study. Stroke 1991;22:312–8. 10.1161/01.STR.22.3.312 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kannel WB, D'Agostino RB, Silbershatz H, et al. Profile for estimating risk of heart failure. Arch Intern Med 1999;159:1197–204. 10.1001/archinte.159.11.1197 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schnabel RB, Sullivan LM, Levy D, et al. Development of a risk score for atrial fibrillation (framingham heart study): a community-based cohort study. Lancet 2009;373:739–45. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60443-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources