Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 14;16(9):e0257128.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257128. eCollection 2021.

The gap between desired and expected fertility among women in Iran: A case study of Tehran city

Affiliations

The gap between desired and expected fertility among women in Iran: A case study of Tehran city

Maryam Hosseini et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

The 2016 Iranian Census reveals that 14 of the country's 31 provinces have sub-replacement fertility. The province of Tehran, where a woman on average gives birth to 1.5 children during her reproductive period, has the lowest fertility in Iran. However, the 'two-child' norm prevails in the country and even a woman of young reproductive age still values having at least two children on average. In other words, there exists a gap between a woman's actual and desired fertility. This paper examines the demographic and socio-economic factors influencing the gap between actual and desired fertility in Tehran city based on a sample survey of 400 married women aged 15-49 years, conducted in 2015. The findings of the study reveal that the women of Tehran would be able to meet their fertility desires of two or more children if they were able to achieve their intended number of children they stated in the survey. However, should these women face any socio-economic constraint, they would be very likely to restrain their fertility desires and have fewer additional children than they initially intended, and thus continue with the sub-replacement fertility as being observed in Iran today.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No authors have competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Freedman R, Freedman DS, Thornton AD. Changes in fertility expectations and preferences between 1962 and 1977: Their relation to final parity. Demography. 1980;17(4):365–78. - PubMed
    1. Hagewen KJ, Morgan SP. Intended and ideal family size in the United States, 1970–2002. Population and Development Review. 2005;31(3):507–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2005.00081.x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Monnier A. Fertility intentions and actual behaviour. A longitudinal study: 1974, 1976, 1979. Population English Selection No 1. 1989:237–59. - PubMed
    1. Roy TK, Sinha R, Koenig M, Mohanty SK, Patel SK. Consistency and predictive ability of fertility preference indicators: Longitudinal evidence from rural India. International Family Planning Perspectives. 2008:138–45. doi: 10.1363/ifpp.34.138.08 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thomson E, McDonald E, Bumpass LL. Fertility desires and fertility: Hers, his, and theirs. Demography. 1990;27(4):579–88. - PubMed

Publication types