Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 14;21(1):951.
doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06585-8.

Clinical characteristics and risk factors of fatal patients with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study in Wuhan, China

Affiliations

Clinical characteristics and risk factors of fatal patients with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study in Wuhan, China

Meng Jin et al. BMC Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused a global pandemic, resulting in considerable mortality. The risk factors, clinical treatments, especially comprehensive risk models for COVID-19 death are urgently warranted.

Methods: In this retrospective study, 281 non-survivors and 712 survivors with propensity score matching by age, sex, and comorbidities were enrolled from January 13, 2020 to March 31, 2020.

Results: Higher SOFA, qSOFA, APACHE II and SIRS scores, hypoxia, elevated inflammatory cytokines, multi-organ dysfunction, decreased immune cell subsets, and complications were significantly associated with the higher COVID-19 death risk. In addition to traditional predictors for death risk, including APACHE II (AUC = 0.83), SIRS (AUC = 0.75), SOFA (AUC = 0.70) and qSOFA scores (AUC = 0.61), another four prediction models that included immune cells subsets (AUC = 0.90), multiple organ damage biomarkers (AUC = 0.89), complications (AUC = 0.88) and inflammatory-related indexes (AUC = 0.75) were established. Additionally, the predictive accuracy of combining these risk factors (AUC = 0.950) was also significantly higher than that of each risk group alone, which was significant for early clinical management for COVID-19.

Conclusions: The potential risk factors could help to predict the clinical prognosis of COVID-19 patients at an early stage. The combined model might be more suitable for the death risk evaluation of COVID-19.

Keywords: COVID-19; Death risk; Immune cells subsets; Risk prediction models.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We declare that we have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Representative chest computed tomographic images of fatal and recovered patients with COVID-19. a-c. An elderly male recovered case confirmed with COVID-19 at different disease stages. a Axial chest CT image obtained at the onset shows diffuse ground-glass opacity (GGO) and fibrous stripes; b axial chest CT image obtained at the middle stage shows bilateral, peripheral GGO and fibrous stripes associated with smooth interlobular and intralobular septal thickening; c axial chest CT image obtained at discharge stage shows bilateral fibrous stripes and nodules. df An elderly male fatal case confirmed with COVID-19 at different disease stages. a Axial chest CT obtained at the onset shows bilateral diffuse GGO associated with round cystic change, local bronchial meteorology and left pleural effusion; e axial chest CT image obtained at the middle stage shows the progression of bilateral GGO, bronchial meteorology and pleural effusion; f axial chest CT image obtained near stage of death shows the progression of bilateral GGO, round cystic change, bronchial meteorology, and increase of pleural effusion
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Comprehensive prediction models for death risk of COVID-19 patients. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) were employed to assess the predictive accuracy of models evaluating the death risk of COVID-19 with SOFA, qSOFA, APACHE II and SIRS scores, inflammatory-related indexes, complications, organ damage indexes, immune cell subsets and combined group integrating abovementioned these factors. The multivariate Cox proportional hazards model analysis were used to establish a risk model. The stepwise regression was used for the selection of the prediction for the model. ROC curves and AUCs (95% CIs) values were generated to assess prognostic accuracy for each model. A two-sided P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant

References

    1. World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak situation. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019. Accessed 5 Jan 2020
    1. Wang Z, Yang B, Li Q, Wen L, Zhang R: Clinical features of 69 cases with coronavirus disease 2019 in Wuhan, China. Clin Infect Dis. 2020. - PMC - PubMed
    1. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference: definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Crit Care Med 1992; 20(6):864–74. - PubMed
    1. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985;13(10):818–829. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198510000-00009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, Zhu F, Liu X, Zhang J, Wang B, Xiang H, Cheng Z, Xiong Y, et al. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA. 2020;323:1061–1069. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1585. - DOI - PMC - PubMed