Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2021 Nov 2;97(18):e1757-e1767.
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012766. Epub 2021 Sep 14.

Safety and Efficacy of Natalizumab as Adjunctive Therapy for People With Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Phase 2 Study

Collaborators, Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Safety and Efficacy of Natalizumab as Adjunctive Therapy for People With Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Phase 2 Study

Jacqueline A French et al. Neurology. .

Abstract

Background and objectives: To explore efficacy/safety of natalizumab, a humanized monoclonal anti-α4-integrin antibody, as adjunctive therapy in adults with drug-resistant focal epilepsy.

Methods: Participants with ≥6 seizures during the 6-week baseline period were randomized 1:1 to receive natalizumab 300 mg IV or placebo every 4 weeks for 24 weeks. Primary efficacy outcome was change from baseline in log-transformed seizure frequency, with a predefined threshold for therapeutic success of 31% relative reduction in seizure frequency over the placebo group. Countable seizure types were focal aware with motor signs, focal impaired awareness, and focal to bilateral tonic-clonic. Secondary efficacy endpoints/safety were also assessed.

Results: Of 32 and 34 participants dosed in the natalizumab 300 mg and placebo groups, 30 (94%) and 31 (91%) completed the placebo-controlled treatment period, respectively (one participant was randomized to receive natalizumab but not dosed due to IV complications). Estimated relative change in seizure frequency of natalizumab over placebo was -14.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] -46.1%-36.1%; p = 0.51). The proportion of participants with ≥50% reduction from baseline in seizure frequency was 31.3% for natalizumab and 17.6% for placebo (odds ratio 2.09, 95% CI 0.64-6.85; p = 0.22). Adverse events were reported in 24 (75%) and 22 (65%) participants receiving natalizumab vs placebo.

Discussion: Although the threshold to demonstrate efficacy was not met, there were no unexpected safety findings and further exploration of possible anti-inflammatory therapies for drug-resistant epilepsy is warranted.

Trial registration information: The ClinicalTrials.gov registration number is NCT03283371.

Classification of evidence: This study provides Class I evidence that IV natalizumab every 4 weeks, compared to placebo, did not significantly change seizure frequency in adults with drug-resistant epilepsy. The study lacked the precision to exclude an important effect of natalizumab.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Patient Disposition
aThe intent-to-treat (ITT) population was defined as all participants who were randomized and received ≥1 dose of double-blind treatment. bThe safety population was defined as all participants who were randomized and received any dose of study treatment.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Change From Baseline Over Time in Log-Transformed Seizure Frequency
The overall relative percent change (95% confidence interval) over placebo from weeks 8–24 was −14.38 (−46.13, 36.09). LS = least squares.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Serum Concentration of Natalizumab, Saturation of α4-Integrin, and Soluble Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1 (sVCAM-1) Concentration
(A) Serum concentration of natalizumab 300 mg. (B) Saturation of α4-integrin. (C) sVCAM-1 concentration. GSD = geometric SD.

Comment in

References

    1. Macdonald RL, Kelly KM. Antiepileptic drug mechanisms of action. Epilepsia. 1995;36(suppl 2):S2-S12. - PubMed
    1. Rogawski MA, Löscher W. The neurobiology of antiepileptic drugs. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004;5(5):553-564. - PubMed
    1. Kwan P, Brodie MJ. Early identification of refractory epilepsy. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(5):314-319. - PubMed
    1. Xia L, Ou S, Pan S. Initial response to antiepileptic drugs in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy as a predictor of long-term outcome. Front Neurol. 2017;8:658. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nadkarni S, LaJoie J, Devinsky O. Current treatments of epilepsy. Neurology. 2005;64(12 suppl 3):S2-S11. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data