Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Sep 14;7(1):121.
doi: 10.1038/s41523-021-00326-5.

A common goal to CARE: Cancer Advocates, Researchers, and Clinicians Explore current treatments and clinical trials for breast cancer brain metastases

Affiliations
Review

A common goal to CARE: Cancer Advocates, Researchers, and Clinicians Explore current treatments and clinical trials for breast cancer brain metastases

Natalie S Joe et al. NPJ Breast Cancer. .

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women worldwide. Approximately one-tenth of all patients with advanced breast cancer develop brain metastases resulting in an overall survival rate of fewer than 2 years. The challenges lie in developing new approaches to treat, monitor, and prevent breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM). This review will provide an overview of BCBM from the integrated perspective of clinicians, researchers, and patient advocates. We will summarize the current management of BCBM, including diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring. We will highlight ongoing translational research for BCBM, including clinical trials and improved detection methods that can become the mainstay for BCBM treatment if they demonstrate efficacy. We will discuss preclinical BCBM research that focuses on the intrinsic properties of breast cancer cells and the influence of the brain microenvironment. Finally, we will spotlight emerging studies and future research needs to improve survival outcomes and preserve the quality of life for patients with BCBM.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

V.S. has received research grants to JHU from Abbvie, Biocept, Pfizer, Novartis, and Puma Biotechnology and is a member of the Data Safety Monitoring Board at Immunomedics, Inc. K.R. has received travel expenses from Brainlab, Accuray, and Elekta, research funding from Accuracy and Elekta, honorariums from Elekta and NCCN, and is a member of the Data Safety Monitoring Board at Biomimtix. C.H. has received funding from Roche/Genentech (honoraria, consulting/advisory), Pfizer (consulting/advisory), Johns Hopkins Hospital (consulting/advisory), NIH/NCI Cancer Moonshot (consulting/advisory), and Eli Lilly (travel, accommodations, expenses). D.G., L.K., and N.J. have no conflicts to disclose.

References

    1. Taherian-Fard A, Srihari S, Ragan MA. Breast cancer classification: linking molecular mechanisms to disease prognosis. Brief. Bioinform. 2014;16:461–474. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbu020. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sørlie T. Molecular portraits of breast cancer: tumour subtypes as distinct disease entities. Eur. J. Cancer. 2004;40:2667–2675. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2004.08.021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Perou CM, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2000;406:747–752. doi: 10.1038/35021093. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Harbeck N, et al. Breast cancer. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2019;5:1–31. doi: 10.1038/s41572-018-0051-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sperduto PW, et al. Beyond an updated graded prognostic assessment (Breast GPA): a prognostic index and trends in treatment and survival in breast cancer brain metastases from 1985 to today. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2020;107:334–343. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.01.051. - DOI - PMC - PubMed