Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Sep 3;7(9):e07918.
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07918. eCollection 2021 Sep.

Environmental impact of bioplastic use: A review

Ghada Atiwesh  1 , Abanoub Mikhael  2 , Christopher C Parrish  2   3 , Joseph Banoub  2   4 , Tuyet-Anh T Le  5   6   7
Affiliations
Review

Environmental impact of bioplastic use: A review

Ghada Atiwesh et al. Heliyon. .

Abstract

Throughout their lifecycle, petroleum-based plastics are associated with many environmental problems, including greenhouse gas emissions, persistence in marine and terrestrial environments, pollution, etc. On the other hand, bioplastics form a rapidly growing class of polymeric materials that are commonly presented as alternatives to conventional petroleum-based plastics. However, bioplastics also have been linked to important environmental issues such as greenhouse gas emissions and unfavorable land use change, making it necessary to evaluate the true impact of bioplastic use on the environment. Still, while many reviews discuss bioplastics, few comprehensively and simultaneously address the positives and negatives of bioplastic use for the environment. The primary focus of the present review article is to address this gap in present research. To this end, this review addresses the following questions: (1) what are the different types of bioplastics that are currently in commercial use or under development in the industry; (2) are bioplastics truly good for the environment; and (3) how can we better resolve the controversial impact of bioplastics on the environment? Overall, studies discussed in this review article show that the harms associated with bioplastics are less severe as compared to conventional plastics. Moreover, as new types of bioplastics are developed, it becomes important that future studies conduct thorough life cycle and land use change analyses to confirm the eco-friendliness of these new materials. Such studies will help policymakers to determine whether the use of new-generation bioplastics is indeed beneficial to the environment.

Keywords: Bioplastics; Environment; Life cycle assessment; Petroleum-based plastics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Review methodology.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Chemical structure of PHA.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The structure of PHB plastic.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Polylactic acid (PLA) hydrolysis.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(a) Poly-hydroxybutyrate copolymers. (b) Poly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4hydroxybutyrate) (PHB4B).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Poly (1,4-butylene succinate) (PBS).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Brydson J.A. In: Plastics Materials. seventh ed. Brydson J.A., editor. Elsevier; Amsterdam: 1999. Plastics materials: introduction and historical development; pp. 1–18.
    1. Gervet B. Lulea University of Technology; Lulea: 2007. The Use of Crude Oil in Plastic Making Contributes to Global Warming.
    1. Buis A. The atmosphere: getting a handle on carbon dioxide. NASA Glob. Clim. Change. 2019 October 9
    1. Akindoyo J.O., Beg M.D., Ghazali S., Islam M., Jeyaratnam N., Yuvaraj A. Polyurethane types, synthesis and applications–a review. RSC Adv. 2016;6(115):114453–114482.
    1. Bashir N.H. Plastic problem in Africa. Jpn. J. Vet. Res. 2013;61(Supplement):S1–S11. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources