Prenatal care utilization: its measurement and relationship to pregnancy outcome
- PMID: 3452362
Prenatal care utilization: its measurement and relationship to pregnancy outcome
Abstract
This study proposes a redesigned measure of prenatal care utilization based on modifications made to a preexisting index of the adequacy of such care. Six prenatal care utilization groups were delineated: intensive, adequate, intermediate, inadequate, no-care, and missing/unknown. Using 430,349 cases from South Carolina and North Carolina vital records from 1978 to 1982 (live birth-infant death cohort files for white resident mothers), this proposed prenatal care utilization measure was examined by maternal sociomedical risk characteristics (age-parity, marital status, education, complications of pregnancy, and previous pregnancy terminations) and by pregnancy outcomes (birth weight, gestational age, and birth weight- and gestational age-specific neonatal mortality). The intensive prenatal care group had relatively more pregnancy complications but also the most preferred pregnancy outcomes. Appreciable differences in birth weight and gestational age distributions were observed among the prenatal care categories within maternal risk status groups. Increased utilization of prenatal care was associated with higher mean birth weight and gestational age. However, after controlling for maternal risk status, an appreciable variation in birth weight- and gestational age-specific neonatal mortality was not apparent across prenatal care groups.
Similar articles
-
[Risk factors for low birth weight and intrauterine growth retardation in Santiago, Chile].Rev Med Chil. 1993 Oct;121(10):1210-9. Rev Med Chil. 1993. PMID: 8191127 Spanish.
-
A comparison of four prenatal care indices in birth outcome models: comparable results for predicting small-for-gestational-age outcome but different results for preterm birth or infant mortality.J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Apr;62(4):438-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.08.001. Epub 2008 Oct 22. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009. PMID: 18945589
-
Mexican-Americans' use of prenatal care and its relationship to maternal risk factors and pregnancy outcome.Am J Prev Med. 1992 Jan-Feb;8(1):1-7. Am J Prev Med. 1992. PMID: 1575994
-
A review of prenatal home-visiting effectiveness for improving birth outcomes.J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2011 Mar-Apr;40(2):157-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2011.01219.x. Epub 2011 Feb 11. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2011. PMID: 21314710 Review.
-
The content of prenatal care.Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Sep;74(3 Pt 2):516-28. Obstet Gynecol. 1989. PMID: 2503797 Review.
Cited by
-
Pregnancy outcomes of American Indians: contrasts among regions and with other ethnic groups.Matern Child Health J. 2008 Jul;12 Suppl 1:5-11. doi: 10.1007/s10995-007-0295-z. Epub 2007 Oct 25. Matern Child Health J. 2008. PMID: 17960473
-
Birth outcomes of Korean women in Hawaii.Public Health Rep. 1993 Jul-Aug;108(4):500-5. Public Health Rep. 1993. PMID: 8341786 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring Barriers to Access Prenatal Care Among Indigenous Mexican and Guatemalan Women in Washington State.Womens Reprod Health (Phila). 2023;10(1):110-124. doi: 10.1080/23293691.2022.2061319. Epub 2022 Apr 25. Womens Reprod Health (Phila). 2023. PMID: 37288310 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of revised IOM weight gain guidelines on perinatal outcomes.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011 Mar;24(3):397-401. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2010.497883. Epub 2010 Jul 1. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011. PMID: 20593973 Free PMC article.
-
Clustering of U.S. women receiving no prenatal care: differences in pregnancy outcomes and implications for targeting interventions.Matern Child Health J. 2005 Jun;9(2):125-33. doi: 10.1007/s10995-005-4869-3. Matern Child Health J. 2005. PMID: 15965618
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical