Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 1;98(9):1078-1084.
doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001775.

Physician Prescribing and Referral Patterns in Children with Cerebral Visual Impairment

Affiliations

Physician Prescribing and Referral Patterns in Children with Cerebral Visual Impairment

Melissa L Rice et al. Optom Vis Sci. .

Abstract

Significance: Cerebral visual impairment (CVI) is the leading cause of visual impairment in the developed world. Providing children with CVI with the appropriate treatment ensures the best possible visual outcome and potentially improves quality of life.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine physician prescribing and visual rehabilitation referral patterns in children with CVI.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was completed on children with CVI examined at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center from January 1, 2008, to March 1, 2018. Significant refractive error warranting correction was determined using the American Academy of Ophthalmology Preferred Guidelines and the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus Vision Screening Committee Guidelines. The CVI Range was used as a surrogate to categorize CVI severity.

Results: A total of 194 children were included. Sixty-eight (35%) had refractive error warranting correction and were prescribed glasses (group RC), 99 (51%) did not have refractive error warranting correction and were not prescribed glasses (group NRNC), 20 (10%) had refractive error warranting correction but were not prescribed glasses (group RNC), and 7 (4%) did not have refractive error warranting correction but were prescribed glasses (group NRC). There was greater than one-line Snellen equivalent difference between group RC (20/156) and group RNC (20/221). There was greater than six-line Snellen equivalent difference between group NRNC (20/149) and group NRC (20/35). Mean CVI Range score 2 values for each group were 5.9, 4.6, 4.8, and 7.1.

Conclusions: Children with less severe CVI were less likely to have significant refractive error but given glasses. Despite significant refractive error, children with more severe CVI were not prescribed glasses. Children with very low visual function were not prescribed glasses as frequently, possibly limiting their visual rehabilitation. Providers should ensure that all children with CVI are correctly prescribed glasses to provide the best possible visual outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosure: None of the authors have reported a financial conflict of interest.

References

    1. Chang MY, Borchert MS. Advances in the Evaluation and Management of Cortical/Cerebral Visual Impairment in Children. Surv Ophthalmol 2020;65:708–24.
    1. Good WV, Jan JE, DeSa L, et al. Cortical Visual Impairment in Children. Surv Ophthalmol 1994;38:351–64.
    1. Sakki HEA, Dale NJ, Sargent J, et al. Is There Consensus in Defining Childhood Cerebral Visual Impairment? A Systematic Review of Terminology and Definitions. Br J Ophthalmol 2018;102:424–32.
    1. Dutton GN, Jacobson LK. Cerebral Visual Impairment in Children. Semin Neonatol 2001;6:477–85.
    1. Wallace DK, Morse CL, Melia M, et al; American Academy of Ophthalmology Preferred Practice Pattern Pediatric Ophthalmology/Strabismus Panel. Pediatric Eye Evaluations Preferred Practice Pattern®: I. Vision Screening in the Primary Care and Community Setting; II. Comprehensive Ophthalmic Examination. Ophthalmology 2018;125:P184–227.

LinkOut - more resources