Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Nov;52(11):e702-e705.
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.034099. Epub 2021 Sep 16.

Reporting of Results by Sex in Randomized Controlled Trials of Acute Stroke Therapies (2010-2020)

Affiliations
Review

Reporting of Results by Sex in Randomized Controlled Trials of Acute Stroke Therapies (2010-2020)

Julia Pudar et al. Stroke. 2021 Nov.

Abstract

Background and purpose: When reporting primary results from randomized controlled trials, recommendations include reporting results by sex. We reviewed the reporting of results by sex in contemporary acute stroke randomized controlled trials.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE for articles reporting the primary results of phase 2 or 3 stroke randomized controlled trials published between 2010 and June 2020 in one of nine major clinical journals. Eligible trials were restricted to those with a therapeutic intervention initiated within one month of stroke onset. Of primary interest was the reporting of results by sex for the primary outcome. We performed bivariate analyses using Fisher exact tests to identify study-level factors associated with reporting by sex and investigated temporal trends using an exact test for trend.

Results: Of the 115 studies identified, primary results were reported by sex in 37% (n=42). Reporting varied significantly by journal, with the New England Journal of Medicine (61%) and Lancet journals (40%) having the highest rates (P=0.03). Reporting also differed significantly by geographic region (21% Europe versus 48% Americas, P=0.03), trial phase (13% phase 2 versus 40% phase 3, P=0.05), and sample size (24% <250 participants versus 61% >750 participants, P<0.01). Although not statistically significant (P=0.11), there was a temporal trend in favor of greater reporting among later publications (25% 2010–2012 versus 48% 2019–2020).

Conclusions: Although reporting of primary trial results by sex improved from 2010 to 2020, the prevalence of reporting in major journals is still low. Further efforts are required to encourage journals and authors to comply with current reporting recommendations.

Keywords: randomized controlled trials; sex distribution; sex-specific outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer