Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec;30(12):2154-2166.
doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-21-0376. Epub 2021 Sep 14.

Exposure Definition in Case-Control Studies of Cervical Cancer Screening: A Systematic Literature Review

Affiliations

Exposure Definition in Case-Control Studies of Cervical Cancer Screening: A Systematic Literature Review

Alejandra Castanon et al. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

The first step in evaluating the effectiveness of cervical screening is defining exposure to screening. Our aim was to describe the spectrum of screening exposure definitions used in studies of the effectiveness of cervical screening. This systematic review included case-control studies in a population-based screening setting. Outcome was incidence of cervical cancer. Three electronic databases were searched from January 1, 2012 to December 6, 2018. Articles prior to 2012 were identified from a previous review. The qualitative synthesis focused on describing screening exposure definitions reported in the literature and the methodologic differences that could have an impact on the association between screening and cervical cancer. Forty-one case-control studies were included. Six screening exposure definitions were identified. Cervical cancer risk on average decreased by 66% when screening exposure was defined as ever tested, by 77% by time since last negative test, and by 79% after two or more previous tests. Methodologic differences included composition of the reference group and whether diagnostic and/or symptomatic tests were excluded from the analysis. Consensus guidelines to standardize exposure definitions are needed to ensure evaluations of cervical cancer screening can accurately measure the impact of transitioning from cytology to human papillomavirus-based screening and to allow comparisons between programs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram detailing database searches, abstracts screened, and full texts retrieved and included in the systematic review.
Figure 1.
PRISMA flow diagram detailing database searches, abstracts screened, and full texts retrieved and included in the systematic review.

References

    1. Cole P, Morrison AS. Basic issues in population screening for cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1980;64:1263–72. - PubMed
    1. Weiss NS. Case-control studies of the efficacy of screening tests designed to prevent the incidence of cancer. Am J Epidemiol 1999;149:1–4. - PubMed
    1. Schiffman M, Wentzensen N. Human papillomavirus infection and the multistage carcinogenesis of cervical cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2013;22:553–60. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weiss NS, McKnight B, Stevens NG. Approaches to the analysis of case-control studies of the efficacy of screening for cancer. Am J Epidemiol 1992;135:817–23. - PubMed
    1. Etzioni RD, Weiss NS. Analysis of case-control studies of screening: impact of misspecifying the duration of detectable preclinical pathologic changes. Am J Epidemiol 1998;148:292–7. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms