Differences in the potential for dementia prevention between major ethnic groups within one country: A cross sectional analysis of population attributable fraction of potentially modifiable risk factors in New Zealand
- PMID: 34527984
- PMCID: PMC8358157
- DOI: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100191
Differences in the potential for dementia prevention between major ethnic groups within one country: A cross sectional analysis of population attributable fraction of potentially modifiable risk factors in New Zealand
Abstract
Background: Twelve potentially modifiable risk factors (less education, hypertension, obesity, alcohol, traumatic brain injury (TBI), hearing loss, smoking, depression, physical inactivity, social isolation, diabetes, air pollution) account for an estimated 40% of worldwide dementia cases. We aimed to calculate population attributable fractions (PAFs) for dementia for the four largest New Zealand ethnic groups (European, Māori, Asian, and Pacific peoples) to identify whether optimal dementia prevention targets differed by ethnicity.
Methods: We calculated risk factor prevalence for 10 risk factors using the New Zealand Health Survey 2018/19 and published reports for hearing loss and TBI prevalences. We calculated the PAF for each risk factor using calculated prevalence and relative risk estimates from previous meta-analyses. To account for risk factor overlap, we calculated communality of risk factors and a weighted PAF.
Findings: The weighted PAF for dementia was 47.7% overall in New Zealand, 47.6% for Europeans, 51.4% for Māori, 50.8% for Pacific peoples, and 40.8% for Asians. Highest PAFs for Europeans were hearing loss (8%) and social isolation (5.7%), and for Asians hearing loss (7.3%) and physical inactivity (5.5%). For Māori and Pacific peoples, highest PAFs were for obesity (7.3% and 8.9% respectively) and hearing loss (6.5% and 6.6%).
Interpretation: New Zealand has higher dementia prevention potential than worldwide estimates with high prevalences of untreated hearing loss and obesity. The relative contribution of individual risk factors PAFs varies by ethnic group. Public health strategies for dementia prevention need to be tailored to these differences.
Funding: Health Research Council of New Zealand (HRC:20/021).
© 2021 The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
We declare no competing interests.The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- World Health Organisation . World Health Organization; 2004. ICD-10: international statistical classification of diseases and related health problems: tenth revision. 2nd ed.
-
- Paterson C. Alzheimer’s Disease International; London: 2018. World Alzheimer Report 2018. The state of the art of dementia research: New frontiers. 2018.
-
- Deloitte Access Economics Dementia Economic Impact Report 2016. Wellington: Alzheimers New Zealand. 2017
-
- Statistics New Zealand. National ethnic projections, by age and sex, 2013(base)-2038.[Available from: http://nzdotstat.stats.govt.nz/wbos/index.aspx?_ga=2.167222078.185807852....
-
- Livingston G, Sommerlad A, Orgeta V, Costafreda SG, Huntley J, Ames D. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care. Lancet. 2017;390(10113):2673–2734. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
