Alternative Tendon Coaptations to the Pulvertaft Weave Technique: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Biomechanical Studies
- PMID: 34528473
- PMCID: PMC10152540
- DOI: 10.1177/15589447211043213
Alternative Tendon Coaptations to the Pulvertaft Weave Technique: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Biomechanical Studies
Abstract
Background: The Pulvertaft weave technique (PT) is frequently used during tendon repairs and transfers. However, this technique is associated with limitations. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed on in vitro, biomechanical studies that compared the PT with alternative techniques.
Methods: Articles included for qualitative and/or qualitative analysis were identified following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies included in the meta-analysis were analyzed either as continuous data with inverse variance and random effects or as dichotomous data using a Mantel-Haenszel analysis assuming random effects to calculate an odds ratio.
Results: A comprehensive electronic search yielded 8 studies meeting inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. Two studies with a total of 65 tendon coaptations demonstrated no significant difference in strength between the PT and traditional side-to-side (STS) techniques (P = .92). Two studies with a total of 43 tendon coaptations showed that the STS with 1 weave has a higher yield strength than the PT (P = .03). Two studies with a total of 62 tendon repairs demonstrated no significant difference in strength between the PT and the step-cut (SC) techniques (P = .70). The final 2 studies included 46 tendon repairs and demonstrated that the wrap around (WA) technique has a higher yield strength than the PT (P < .001).
Conclusions: The STS, SC, and WA techniques are preferred for improving tendon form. The STS and WA techniques have superior yield strengths than the PT, and the SC technique withstands similar stress to failure as the PT.
Keywords: Pulvertaft; basic science; hand surgery; side-to-side; step-cut; tendon; wrap around.
Conflict of interest statement
The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: S.D.M. is an educational consultant for PolyNovo and receives research funding from CoNextions Medical. The other authors have no potential conflicts of interests pertaining to this article.
Figures






References
-
- Pulvertaft RG.Tendon grafts for flexor tendon injuries in the fingers and thumb; a study of technique and results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1956;38-B(1):175-194. - PubMed
-
- Choke A, Rung WY, McGrouther DA, et al.. The strengths of one-, two-, and three-weave Pulvertaft tendon repairs. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2020;45:1051-1054. - PubMed
-
- Meals CG, Meals RA.Tendon versus nerve transfers in elbow, wrist, and hand reconstruction: a literature review. Hand Clin. 2013;29(3):393-400. - PubMed
-
- Kulikov YI, Dodd S, Gheduzzi S, et al.. An in vitro biomechanical study comparing the spiral linking technique against the Pulvertaft weave for tendon repair. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2007;32(4):377-381. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical