The role of transperineal ultrasound in the evaluation of stress urinary incontinence cases
- PMID: 34528775
- PMCID: PMC8691236
- DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.1100
The role of transperineal ultrasound in the evaluation of stress urinary incontinence cases
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the use of transperineal ultrasonography while diagnosing stress urinary incontinence (SUI) by comparing the urethral angle (α), posterior urethrovesical angle (β), and bladder neck descent (BND) during rest and Valsalva maneuver in continent women and women with SUI.
Materials and methods: This prospective observational study was conducted with 50 women with SUI and 50 continent women. Transperineal ultrasonography was performed at rest and during Valsalva maneuver. Q-tip test was performed.
Results: During the Valsalva maneuver, both α and β angles were significantly higher in women with SUI (p < 0.001). The difference between Valsalva and rest measurements of α and β angles (R α, R β) were also significantly higher in women with SUI (p < 0.001). The cut-off point determined for the R α in the diagnosis of stress incontinence was 16° (80% sensitivity, 98% specificity). A statistically significant strong correlation was found between Q-tip test angle and R α value (p=0.000; r=0.890). Q-tip VAS pain scores were significantly higher than ultrasonography VAS pain scores (p < 0.001). In relation to the bladder neck descent comparison between the two groups showed that BND was significantly higher in SUI group (p < 0.001). The cut-off point determined for BND in the diagnosis of SUI was >11mm (90% sensitivity, 98% specificity).
Conclusion: Transperineal ultrasonography is a practical, reliable, non-invasive and comfortable method for evaluation of SUI. It has the advantage of dynamic evaluation during the Valsalva maneuver. Rotation angles and BND have high sensitivity and specificity for detection of SUI. The change in α angle with Valsalva (Rα) can be used as an alternative to Q-tip test.
Keywords: Ultrasonography; Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction; Urinary Incontinence, Stress.
Copyright® by the International Brazilian Journal of Urology.
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
Figures
Comment in
-
Re: The role of transperineal ultrasound in the evaluation of stress urinary incontinence.Int Braz J Urol. 2022 Mar-Apr;48(2):379-380. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.1100.1. Int Braz J Urol. 2022. PMID: 35170908 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29:4-20. - PubMed
-
- DeLancey JO. Structural support of the urethra as it relates to stress urinary incontinence: the hammock hypothesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 170:1713-20. - PubMed
-
- Schaer GN, Koechli OR, Schuessler B, Haller U. Perineal ultrasound for evaluating the bladder neck in urinary stress incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 85:220-4. - PubMed
-
- Pregazzi R, Sartore A, Bortoli P, Grimaldi E, Troiano L, Guaschino S. Perineal ultrasound evaluation of urethral angle and bladder neck mobility in women with stress urinary incontinence. BJOG. 2002; 109:821-7. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical