Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Patients With Advanced Pleural Mesothelioma at an Academic Referral Centre
- PMID: 34531139
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2021.08.003
Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Patients With Advanced Pleural Mesothelioma at an Academic Referral Centre
Abstract
Background: Overall survival (OS) for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) in vulnerable subgroups remains poorly understood with scarce data available to guide treatment decisions. The study describes real-world detailed treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with advanced MPM overall and specifically in elderly and poor performance status (PS) patients.
Methods: Retrospective chart review was performed for all patients with histologically confirmed MPM seen at University Health Network/Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (UHN-PM).
Results: A total of 667 patients with MPM were identified and 304 advanced-disease MPM (aMPM) patients had continuing care at UHN-PM (UP-cohort). In the UP-cohort, 77% of patients received ≥ one line of systemic treatment. Systemic therapy trial participation was 39%. Patients not treated with systemic therapy (29%) were more likely to be ≥ 75 years and PS ≥ 2. Median OS was 15.3 months (95%CI 13.6-18.3), with longer survival in treated vs. untreated patients (17.4 vs. 10.6 months; P = .01). Longer survival with systemic treatment was seen in patients ≥75 years (12.7 vs. 6.6 months) and patients with poor PS (9.1 vs. 5.9 months). Median progression-free-survival (PFS) and OS for patients treated with second-line therapy was poor (3.0 and 8.9 months, respectively).
Discussion: In our real-world analysis of patients with aMPM treated at an academic referral centre, systemic treatment was given to the majority of patients and benefit was seen even in the elderly and poor PS patients frequently underrepresented in clinical trials. Trial participation was potentially facilitated by the formation of a dedicated multidisciplinary MPM clinic.
Keywords: Elderly; mesothelioma; multidisciplinary clinic; poor performance status; real-world analysis; systemic, treatment.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure Sabine Schmid: Advisory (institutional): Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, BMS; Research grants (institutional): BMS, Astra Zeneca; Travel support: Takeda, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD Adrian Sacher: Consulting, Advisory Boards: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Genentech-Roche, BMS, KisoJi; Honoraria & Sponsored CME/Symposia: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Merck, Genentech-Roche, Bayer, BMS, Pfizer, Tesaro, KisoJi, Iovance, Galvanize Therapeutics; Sponsored Research: AstraZeneca, Genentech imCORE Marc de Perrot: Speaker's bureau: Bayer; Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Actelion Penelope Bradbury: Financial- Honoraria: Merck; Advisory Board: Boehringer Ingelheim; Advisory Boards without financial remuneration: Abbvie, BMS, AstraZeneca Geoffrey Liu: Honoraria/Advisory: AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Takeda, Novartis, Abbvie, Bayer, Roche; Speaker's bureau: AstraZeneca, Takeda, EMD Serono; Grants (to institution): AstraZeneca, Takeda, Boehringer Ingerheim. None for LZ, KD, KK, MC, MH, DP, FZ, NL, RF, FS, LD, JC
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
