Background factors in patients with hip fractures--differences between cervical and trochanteric fractures
- PMID: 3453291
Background factors in patients with hip fractures--differences between cervical and trochanteric fractures
Abstract
Comparisons were made between 133 men with cervical fractures and 151 men with trochanteric fractures and 308 women with cervical fractures and 449 women with trochanteric fractures. All patients with hip fractures were studied consecutively and prospectively. Patients were interviewed a few days after admission and their medical records studied. We found great differences in background factors between patients with cervical and trochanteric fractures but these differences seemed to depend largely on age. In an age-matched material we find that patients with trochanteric fractures are more prone to such fragility fractures as vertebral fracture, trochanteric fracture and fracture of the upper end of the humerus. This could mean that trochanteric fractures occur in bone of lower trabecular mass.
Similar articles
-
Changes in bone mass and fracture type in patients with hip fractures. A comparison between the 1950s and the 1980s in Malmö, Sweden.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Jan;(238):139-47. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989. PMID: 2642773
-
Age- and sex-specific incidence of femoral neck and trochanteric fractures. An analysis based on 20,538 fractures in Stockholm County, Sweden, 1972-1981.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987 Sep;(222):132-9. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987. PMID: 3621713
-
[Proximal femoral fractures: risk factors, bone mineral density, body composition and biochemical changes in and age-matched patients and controls].Medicina (B Aires). 1996;56(4):353-62. Medicina (B Aires). 1996. PMID: 9138339 Spanish.
-
Are the etiologies of cervical and trochanteric hip fractures different?Bone. 1996 Mar;18(3 Suppl):133S-137S. doi: 10.1016/8756-3282(95)00490-4. Bone. 1996. PMID: 8777078 Review.
-
Time trends in incidence rates of first hip fracture in the Uppsala Health Care Region, Sweden, 1965-1983.Am J Epidemiol. 1989 Aug;130(2):289-99. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115335. Am J Epidemiol. 1989. PMID: 2487033 Review.
Cited by
-
Ambulation Distance Within 72 Hours after Surgical Management Is a Predictor of 90-Day Ambulatory Capacity in Elderly Patients with Hip Fracture.J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2023 Aug 22;7(8):e23.00079. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-23-00079. eCollection 2023 Aug 1. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2023. PMID: 37607250 Free PMC article.
-
Increasing age-adjusted risk of fragility fractures: a sign of increasing osteoporosis in successive generations?Calcif Tissue Int. 1989 Mar;44(3):157-67. doi: 10.1007/BF02556558. Calcif Tissue Int. 1989. PMID: 2493320 No abstract available.
-
Fractures of the proximal femur in Picardy, France, in 1987.Osteoporos Int. 1993 Jan;3(1):43-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01623176. Osteoporos Int. 1993. PMID: 8422516
-
Factors associated with postoperative quality of life in patients with intertrochanteric fracture.Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Dec 11;86(2):703-711. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001608. eCollection 2024 Feb. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023. PMID: 38333317 Free PMC article.
-
The pathogenesis and treatment of hip fractures.Osteoporos Int. 1991 Sep;1(4):218-31. doi: 10.1007/BF03187466. Osteoporos Int. 1991. PMID: 1790409 Review. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical