Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Sep 21;10(18):e020560.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.020560. Epub 2021 Sep 17.

Glutathione Infusion Before and 3 Days After Primary Angioplasty Blunts Ongoing NOX2-Mediated Inflammatory Response

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Glutathione Infusion Before and 3 Days After Primary Angioplasty Blunts Ongoing NOX2-Mediated Inflammatory Response

Gaetano Tanzilli et al. J Am Heart Assoc. .

Abstract

Background Glutathione is a water-soluble tripeptide with a potent oxidant scavenging activity. We hypothesized that glutathione administration immediately before and after primary angioplasty (primary percutaneous coronary intervention) could be effective in modulating immune cell activation, thereby preventing infarct expansion. Methods and Results One hundred consecutive patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, scheduled to undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention were randomly assigned before the intervention to receive an infusion of glutathione (2500 mg/25 mL over 10 minutes), followed by drug administration at the same doses at 24, 48, and 72 hours elapsing time or placebo. Total leukocytes, NOX2 (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase 2) activation, NO bioavailability, cTpT (serum cardiac troponin T), hsCRP (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein), and TNF-α (tumor necrosis factor α) levels were measured. Left ventricular size and function were assessed within 120 minutes, 5 days, and 6 months from percutaneous coronary intervention. Following reperfusion, a significant reduction of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (P<0.0001), hsCRP generation (P<0.0001), NOX2 activation (P<0.0001), TNF-α levels (P<0.001), and cTpT release (P<0.0001) were found in the glutathione group compared with placebo. In treated patients, blunted inflammatory response was linked to better left ventricular size and function at follow-up (r=0.78, P<0.005). Conclusions Early and prolonged glutathione infusion seems able to protect vital myocardial components and endothelial cell function against harmful pro-oxidant and inflammatory environments, thus preventing maladaptive cardiac repair and left ventricular adverse remodeling. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu; Unique identifier: 2014-004486-25.

Keywords: STEMI; immune cells; inflammation; left ventricular remodeling; oxidative stress; reperfusion injury.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. CONSORT flowchart.
CONSORT indicates Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; GSH, glutathione; MI, myocardial infarction; and PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR) at admission (t0) and after 5 days from reperfusion (t5) in patients who received glutathione (GSH) or placebo.
*P<0.0005 vs controls. # P<0.0005 vs t0. Interaction group time P<0.0001.
Figure 3
Figure 3. sNOX2‐dp) levels (A), TNF‐α (tumor necrosis factor α) levels (B), hsCRP (high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein) (C), and NO (D) at admission (t0), after 2 hours (t2), and after 5 days (t5) from reperfusion in patients who received glutathione (GSH) (n=47, dashed line) or placebo (n=48, continuous line).
**P<0.01. ***P<0.001. ****P<0.0001.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Effect of glutathione (GSH) pretreatment (5 mmol/L or 10 mmol/L) on NO bioavailability (A) and H2O2 levels (B) in human umbilical vein endothelial cells stimulated with TNF‐α (tumor necrosis factor α) (50 ng/mL).
**P<0.01. ***P<0.001.

References

    1. Prabhu SD, Frangogiannis NG. The biological basis for cardiac repair after myocardial infarction. Circ Res. 2016;119:91–112. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.303577. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nahrendorf M, Pittet MJ, Swirski FK. Monocytes: protagonists of infarct inflammation and repair after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2010;121:2437–2445. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.916346. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Engström G, Melander O, Hedblad B. Leukocyte count and incidence of hospitalizations due to heart failure. Circ Heart Fail. 2009;2:217–222. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.108.827071. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maekawa Y, Anzai T, Yoshikawa T, Asakura Y, Takahashi T, Ishikawa S, Mitamura H, Ogawa S. Prognostic significance of peripheral monocytosis after reperfused acute myocardial infarction: a possible role for left ventricular remodeling. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:241–246. DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01721-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Swirski FK, Nahrendorf M. Leukocyte behavior in atherosclerosis, myocardial infarction, and heart failure. Science. 2013;339:161–166. DOI: 10.1126/science.1230719. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types