Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 20;50(1):74-81.
doi: 10.1515/jpm-2021-0214. Print 2022 Jan 27.

The quality of intrapartum cardiotocography in preterm labour

Zohal Faiz  1 , Eline M Van 't Hof  1 , Gerard J Colenbrander  2 , Ralf Lippes  1 , Petra C A M Bakker  1
Affiliations

The quality of intrapartum cardiotocography in preterm labour

Zohal Faiz et al. J Perinat Med. .

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study is to determine the quality of the foetal heart rate (FHR) recording, defined as signal loss, during preterm labour below 28 weeks gestational age (GA) and contribute to the discussion if cardiotocography (CTG) is of value for the extreme preterm foetus.

Methods: From January 2010 to December 2019 a retrospective study was conducted with data of 95 FHR recordings of singletons born between 24 and 28 weeks GA at the Amsterdam University Medical Centre, location VUmc. FHR tracings had a duration of at least 30 min and were obtained via external ultrasound mode. Data of all recordings were divided in two groups according to gestation (24-26 weeks and 26-28 weeks). Signal loss was analysed. Statistical significance was calculated by non-parametric tests and chi-square tests. The median signal loss and the proportion of cases exceeding the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics Guidelines (FIGO) threshold of 20% signal loss were calculated.

Results: One-third of the recordings exceeded the 20% FIGO-criterion for adequate signal quality during the first stage of labour. In the second stage, this was nearly 75%. Similarly, the median signal loss was 13% during the first and 30% during the second stage of labour (p<0.01).

Conclusions: The quality of FHR monitoring in the extreme preterm foetus is inadequate in a large proportion of the foetuses, especially during the second stage. FHR monitoring is therefore controversial and should be used with caution.

Keywords: International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics; cardiotocography; foetal heart rate monitoring; preterm labour; signal quality.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Wilkinson, D, Verhagen, E, Johansson, S. Thresholds for resuscitation of extremely preterm infants in the UK, Sweden, and Netherlands. Pediatrics 2018;142:S574–84. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2018-0478i.
    1. de Laat, MWM, Wiegerinck, MM, Walther, FJ, Boluyt, N, Mol, BWJ, van der Post, JAM, et al.. Practise guideline ‘perinatal management of extremely preterm delivery’. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2010;154:A2701.
    1. Stout, MJ, Cahill, AG. Electronic fetal monitoring: past, present, and future. Clin Perinatol 2011;38:127–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clp.2010.12.002.
    1. Brocklehurst, P, Field, D, Greene, K, Juszczak, E, Keith, R, Kenyon, S, et al.. Quantitative cardiotocography to improve fetal assessment during labor: a preliminary randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016;205:91–7.
    1. Brocklehurst, P, Field, D, Greene, K, Juszczak, E, Kenyon, S, Linsell, L, et al.. Computerised interpretation of fetal heart rate during labour (INFANT): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2017;389:1719–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30568-8.