Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec:70:105877.
doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2021.105877. Epub 2021 Sep 6.

Complex nonverbal response inhibition and stopping impulsivity in childhood stuttering

Affiliations

Complex nonverbal response inhibition and stopping impulsivity in childhood stuttering

Levi C Ofoe et al. J Fluency Disord. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: The primary purpose of this study was to examine complex nonverbal response inhibition and stopping impulsivity in children who do (CWS) and do not stutter (CWNS).

Method: A total of 30 CWS and 30 CWNS between the ages of 3;1 and 6;0 (years; months) performed the Peg-Tapping Task (PTT; Diamond & Taylor, 1996; Luria, 1966), in which children were required to tap a dowel once when an examiner taps twice and vice versa. The main dependent variables were the number of practice trials, response accuracy, response latency for accurate responses, and the number of extra taps (i.e., tapping more than two times).

Results: The CWS were less accurate and slower on the PTT than the CWNS, with no differences in the number of practice trials. Furthermore, the CWS, especially boys, produced more extra taps than the CWNS.

Conclusions: Findings revealed that preschool CWS have weaknesses in complex response inhibition and stopping impulsivity in the nonverbal domain compared to CWNS. Taken together, these findings along with those of previous studies indicate that CWS may have weaknesses in inhibition and impulsivity in the nonverbal domain as well as the verbal domain, suggesting a domain-general weakness.

Keywords: Children; Cognition; Impulsivity; Inhibition; Stuttering.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure A1
Figure A1
Adjusted Mean (and standard error of the mean) Number of Correct Responses for CWS and CWNS on the Peg-Tapping Task (PTT).
Figure A2
Figure A2
Adjusted Mean (and standard error of the mean) Number of Correct Responses for Boys and Girls on the Peg-Tapping Task.
Figure A3
Figure A3
Adjusted Mean (and standard error of the mean) Number of Extra Taps for CWS and CWNS, and Boys and Girls on the Peg-Tapping Task.
Figure A4
Figure A4
Mean (and standard error of the mean) Response Latency (ms) for CWS and CWNS on the Peg-Tapping Task.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ahadi SA, Rothbart MK, & Ye RM (1993). Children in the US and China: Different yet the same. European Journal of Personality, 7, 359–377.
    1. Aksan N, & Kochanska G (2004). Links between systems of inhibition from infancy to preschool years. Child Development, 75, 1477–1490. - PubMed
    1. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1997). Guidelines for audiologic screening Rockville, MD: Author.
    1. Anderson JD, & Ofoe LC (2019). The role of executive function in developmental stuttering. Seminars in Speech and Language, 40, 305–319. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson JD, Pellowski MW, Conture EG, & Kelly EM (2003). Temperament characteristics of young children who stutter. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 1221–1233. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types