Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Sep 18;11(1):37.
doi: 10.1186/s13561-021-00333-z.

Which factors increase informal care hours and societal costs among caregivers of people with dementia? A systematic review of Resource Utilization in Dementia (RUD)

Renira C Angeles  1   2 , Line I Berge  3   4 , Marie H Gedde  3   5 , Egil Kjerstad  6 , Maarja Vislapuu  3 , Nathalie G Puaschitz  3   7 , Bettina S Husebo  3   8
Affiliations
Review

Which factors increase informal care hours and societal costs among caregivers of people with dementia? A systematic review of Resource Utilization in Dementia (RUD)

Renira C Angeles et al. Health Econ Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Nearly 19 million people across OECD countries are living with dementia, and millions of family caregivers are affected by the disease. The costs of informal care are estimated to represent 40-75% of the total dementia cost exceeding formal care time and medical costs.

Objective: To conduct a systematic review to evaluate the methodological quality and factors associated with high informal care hours per month that increase societal costs, and to identify what type of interventions may alleviate the entire burden of informal and formal caregiving.

Methods: The systematic review was registered at PROSPERO (15.12.2020). A search in Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, and web of science for observational studies, cost-effectiveness, and cost of illness (COI) analyses on resource utilization in dementia (RUD) was conducted on 1 December 2020. Our inclusion criteria included a requirement that studies had to use the original RUD, RUD-FOCA or RUD lite in terms of hours or days per month, and costs as primary or secondary outcome, OECD countries, within the last 20 years and a sample population comprising persons with dementia (PwD) ≥65 years and their caregivers. We followed the PRISMA, GRADE, PICO guidelines and Drummond criteria to assess the methodology and quality of the studies.

Results: Of 307 studies, 26 cross-sectional and 3 longitudinal cohort studies were included in the analyses. Two studies had a randomized controlled trial (RCT) design. The methods and cost categories in each study varied widely. Disease severity, caregiver factors, and behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) were associated with high informal care hours and societal cost. One RCT found no effect of a non-pharmacological intervention on informal care hours, yet another RCT found a cost-effective impact of an in-home respite care programme reducing informal care burden and costs.

Conclusion: The divergent use of the RUD components within included studies encourage more harmonized analyses. There are only two RCTs on RUD, one of which shows a significant treatment effect. Larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are required in future RCTs with dedicated focus on cost-enhancing and resource intensive factors such as disease severity and BPSD. Novel interventions must diversify between caregiver and PwD groups.

Prospero registration: CRD42021226388 .

Keywords: Cost of illness; Cost-effectiveness; Family caregivers; Informal caregivers; Resource utility dementia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

MHG, LIB, BSH, MV, EK and RCA declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of RUD study selection
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Wimo A, Reed CC, Dodel R, Belger M, Jones RW, Happich M, Argimon JM, Bruno G, Novick D, Vellas B, Haro JM. The GERAS study: a prospective observational study of costs and resource use in community dwellers with Alzheimer's disease in three European countries - study design and baseline findings. J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;36(2):385–399. doi: 10.3233/JAD-122392. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wimo A. Global estimates of informal care. London: Alzheimer’s Disease International and Karolinska Institutet; 2018.
    1. Junfang X, et al. Global and regional economic costs of dementia: a systematic review. Lancet. 2017;390:S47. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33185-9. - DOI
    1. El-Hayek YH, et al. Tip of the iceberg: assessing the global socioeconomic costs of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias and strategic implications for stakeholders. J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;70(2):323–341. doi: 10.3233/JAD-190426. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. OECD . Care needed. improving the lives of people with dementia. 2018.

LinkOut - more resources