Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Oct:94:106109.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106109. Epub 2021 Sep 15.

The acute surgical unit: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Free article
Meta-Analysis

The acute surgical unit: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Ned Kinnear et al. Int J Surg. 2021 Oct.
Free article

Abstract

Objective: To systematically review comparative studies on the acute surgical unit (ASU) model.

Methods: Searches were performed of Cochrane, Embase, Medline and grey literature. Eligible articles were comparative studies of the Acute Surgical Unit (ASU) model published 01/01/2000-12/03/2020. Amongst patients with any diagnosis, primary outcomes were length of stay, after-hours operating, complications and cost. Secondary outcomes were time to surgical review, time to theatre, mortality and re-admission for patients with any diagnosis, and cholecystectomy during index admission for patients with biliary disease. Additional analyses were planned for specific cohorts, such as patients with appendicitis or cholecystitis.

Results: Searches returned 9,677 results from which 77 eligible publications were identified, representing 150,981 unique patients. Cohorts were adequately homogenous for meta-analysis of all outcomes except cost. For patients with any diagnosis, compared with the Traditional model, the introduction of an ASU model was associated with reduced length of stay (mean difference [MD] 0.68 days; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38-0.98), after-hours operating rates (odds ratio [OR] 0.56; 95% CI 0.46-0.69) and complications (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.33-0.70). Regarding cost, two studies reported savings following ASU introduction, while one found no difference. Amongst secondary outcomes, for patients with any diagnosis, ASU commencement was associated with reduced time to surgical review, time to theatre and mortality. Re-admissions were unchanged. For patients with biliary disease, ASU establishment was associated with superior rates of index cholecystectomy.

Conclusion: Compared to the Traditional structure, the ASU model is superior for most metrics. ASU introduction should be promoted in policy for widespread benefit.

Keywords: Acute surgical unit; Appendicectomy; Cholecystectomy; Cost; Emergency surgery; General surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Wood T, Azin A, Quereshy FA. Effect of time to operation on outcomes in adults who underwent emergency general surgery procedure. J. Surg. Res . 2018;228:118-126.
    1. Ogola GO, Gale Sc, Fau-Haider A, Haider A, Fau-Shafi S, Shafi S. The financial burden of emergency general surgery: national estimates 2010 to 2060. J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2015;79(3):444-448.
    1. Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland. Commissioning Guide: Emergency General Surgery. 2014, Royal College of Surgeons, London, United Kingdom, Accessed 01/06/20]. Available from: https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/standards-and-research/commissioning/commission...
    1. Addison PDR, Getgood A, Paterson-Brown S. Separating elective and emergency surgical care (The Emergency Team). Scot. Med. J . 2001;46(2):48-50.
    1. Page DE, Dooreemeah D, Thiruchelvam D. Acute surgical unit: the Australasian experience. ANZ J. Surg . 2014;84(1–2):25-30.