Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov:112:281-287.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.09.020. Epub 2021 Sep 15.

Evaluation of the performance of 25 SARS-CoV-2 serological rapid diagnostic tests using a reference panel of plasma specimens at the Uganda Virus Research Institute

Affiliations

Evaluation of the performance of 25 SARS-CoV-2 serological rapid diagnostic tests using a reference panel of plasma specimens at the Uganda Virus Research Institute

Tom Lutalo et al. Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Nov.

Abstract

Introduction: Serological testing is needed to better understand the epidemiology of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have been developed to detect specific antibodies, IgM and IgG, to the virus. The performance of 25 of these RDTs was evaluated.

Methods: A serological reference panel of 50 positive and 100 negative plasma specimens was developed from SARS-CoV-2 PCR and antibody positive patients and pre-pandemic SARS-CoV-2-negative specimens collected in 2016. Test performance of the 25 RDTs was evaluated against this panel.

Results: A total of 10 RDTs had a sensitivity ≥98%, while 13 RDTs had a specificity ≥98% to anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies. Four RDTs (Boson, MultiG, Standard Q, and VivaDiag) had both sensitivity and specificity ≥98% to anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies. Only three RDTs had a sensitivity ≥98%, while 10 RDTs had a specificity ≥98% to anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM antibodies. Three RDTs (Autobio, MultiG, and Standard Q) had sensitivity and specificity ≥98% to combined IgG/IgM. The RDTs that performed well also had perfect or almost perfect inter-reader agreement.

Conclusions: This evaluation identified three RDTs with a sensitivity and specificity to IgM/IgG antibodies of ≥98% with the potential for widespread antibody testing in Uganda.

Keywords: COVID-19; Rapid diagnostic test; SARS-CoV-2; antibody; performance; serological reference panel.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aschwanden C (2021) Five reasons why COVID herd immunity is probably impossible. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00728-2. - PubMed
    1. Batra R, et al. A comparative evaluation between the Abbott Panbio™ COVID-19 IgG/IgM rapid test device and Abbott Architect™ SARS CoV-2 IgG assay. Journal of Clinical Virology. 2020;132 doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104645. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. CDC (2020a) CDC's Diagnostic Test for COVID-19 Only and Supplies. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/virus-requests.html.
    1. CDC (2020b) Interim guidelines for COVID-19 antibody testing in Clinical and Public Health Settings. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/resources/antibody-tests-g....
    1. CDC (2021) COVID-19 Serology Surveillance Strategy. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/covid-data/serology-surveillance/.