Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Nov 1;36(11):3023-3031.
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004039. Epub 2021 Apr 5.

Including the Eccentric Phase in Resistance Training to Counteract the Effects of Detraining in Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Including the Eccentric Phase in Resistance Training to Counteract the Effects of Detraining in Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Giuseppe Coratella et al. J Strength Cond Res. .

Abstract

Coratella, G, Beato, M, Bertinato, L, Milanese, C, Venturelli, M, and Schena, F. Including the eccentric phase in resistance training to counteract the effects of detraining in women: a randomized controlled trial. J Strength Cond Res 36(11): 3023-3031, 2022-The current study compared the effects of concentric-based (CONC), eccentric-based (ECC), and traditional concentric-eccentric (TRAD) resistance training on muscle strength, mass, and architecture and the postdetraining retention of the training-induced effects in women. Sixty women were randomly assigned to unilateral volume-equated CONC, ECC, or TRAD knee extension training or control ( N = 15 per group). Before training, after an 8-week intervention period, and after an 8-week detraining period, isokinetic concentric, eccentric, and isometric torque were measured. In addition, thigh lean mass was assessed by dual X-ray absorptiometry and vastus lateralis thickness, pennation angle, and fascicle length by ultrasound. After training, concentric and isometric torque increased ( p < 0.05) similarly in all groups, whereas eccentric torque increased more in ECC than that in CONC (+13.1%, effect size (ES): 0.71 [0.04-1.38]) and TRAD (+12.6%, ES: 0.60 [0.12-1.08]). Thigh lean mass increased in ECC (+6.1%, ES: 0.47 [0.27-0.67]) and TRAD (+3.1%, ES: 0.33 [0.01-0.65]). Vastus lateralis thickness and pennation angle increased ( p < 0.05) similarly in all groups, whereas fascicle elongation was visible in ECC (+9.7%, ES: 0.92 [0.14-1.65]) and TRAD (+7.1%, ES: 0.64 [0.03-1.25]). After detraining, all groups retained ( p < 0.05) similar concentric torque. ECC and TRAD preserved eccentric torque ( p < 0.05), but ECC more than TRAD (+17.9%, ES: 0.61 [0.21-1.21]). All groups preserved isometric torque ( p < 0.05), but ECC more than CONC (+14.2%, ES: 0.71 [0.04-1.38]) and TRAD (+13.8%, ES: 0.65 [0.10-1.20]). Thigh lean mass and vastus lateralis fascicle length were retained only in ECC ( p < 0.05), pennation angle was preserved in all groups ( p < 0.05), and thickness was retained in CONC and ECC ( p < 0.05). Including the eccentric phase in resistance training is essential to preserve adaptations after detraining.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study design.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
A typical ultrasound scan.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Time course of concentric, eccentric, and isometric peak torque is shown for each group. a: p < 0.05 vs. pre. *p < 0.05 vs. CTRL. #p < 0.05 vs. CONC. §p < 0.05 vs. TRAD. CONC = concentric-only training; ECC = eccentric-only training; TRAD = traditional concentric-eccentric training; CTRL = control group.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Time course of thigh lean mass and vastus lateralis thickness is shown for each group. a: p < 0.05 vs. pre. *p < 0.05 vs. CTRL. #p < 0.05 vs. CONC. §p < 0.05 vs. TRAD. CONC = concentric-only training; ECC = eccentric-only training; TRAD = traditional concentric-eccentric training; CTRL = control group.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Time course of vastus lateralis pennation angle and fascicle length is shown for each group. a: p < 0.05 vs. pre. *p < 0.05 vs. CTRL. #p < 0.05 vs. CONC. §p < 0.05 vs. TRAD. CONC = concentric-only training; ECC = eccentric-only training; TRAD = traditional concentric-eccentric training; CTRL = control group.

References

    1. Alegre LM, Aguado X, Rojas-Martín D, et al. Load-controlled moderate and high-intensity resistance training programs provoke similar strength gains in young women. Muscle Nerve 51: 92–101, 2015. - PubMed
    1. Andersen LL, Andersen JL, Magnusson SP, Aagaard P. Neuromuscular adaptations to detraining following resistance training in previously untrained subjects. Eur J Appl Physiol 93: 511–518, 2005. - PubMed
    1. Baroni BM, De Azevedo Franke R, Rodrigues R, et al. Are the responses to resistance training different between the preferred and nonpreferred limbs? J Strength Cond Res 30: 733–738, 2016. - PubMed
    1. Baroni BM, Geremia JM, Rodrigues R, et al. Muscle architecture adaptations to knee extensor eccentric training: Rectus femoris vs. vastus lateralis. Muscle Nerve 48: 498–506, 2013. - PubMed
    1. Blazevich AJ, Cannavan D, Coleman DR, Horne S. Influence of concentric and eccentric resistance training on architectural adaptation in human quadriceps muscles. J Appl Physiol 103: 1565–1575, 2007. - PubMed

Publication types