Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2021 Oct;38(10):5361-5380.
doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01904-6. Epub 2021 Sep 19.

Roxadustat for the Maintenance Treatment of Anemia in Patients with End-Stage Kidney Disease on Stable Dialysis: A European Phase 3, Randomized, Open-Label, Active-Controlled Study (PYRENEES)

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Roxadustat for the Maintenance Treatment of Anemia in Patients with End-Stage Kidney Disease on Stable Dialysis: A European Phase 3, Randomized, Open-Label, Active-Controlled Study (PYRENEES)

Botond Csiky et al. Adv Ther. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Introduction: Roxadustat is an orally administered hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor being developed for the treatment of anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD). This European, phase 3, randomized, open-label, active-controlled study investigated efficacy and safety of roxadustat in patients with end-stage kidney disease on dialysis for at least 4 months.

Methods: Patients were randomized to switch from an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) (epoetin alfa or darbepoetin alfa) to roxadustat three times/week or to continue their previous ESA. Roxadustat and ESA doses were adjusted to maintain hemoglobin within 10.0-12.0 g/dL during the treatment period (day 1 up to 52-104 weeks). Primary endpoints were hemoglobin change from baseline (CFB) to the average of weeks 28-36 without rescue therapy and hemoglobin CFB to the average of weeks 28-52 regardless of rescue therapy. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed descriptively.

Results: Of 1081 screened patients, 836 were randomized and received treatment (roxadustat, n = 415; ESA, n = 421). The least squares means (95% CI) of the treatment difference (roxadustat - ESA) for hemoglobin CFB to weeks 28-36 (without rescue therapy) and CFB to weeks 28-52 (regardless of rescue therapy) were 0.235 (0.132, 0.339) g/dL and 0.171 (0.082, 0.261) g/dL, respectively, demonstrating non-inferiority of roxadustat to ESA (non-inferiority margin of - 0.75 g/dL). The proportions of patients who achieved target hemoglobin without rescue therapy during weeks 28-36 were 84.2% (roxadustat) and 82.4% (ESA). Roxadustat was superior to ESA in decreasing LDL cholesterol from baseline to the average of weeks 12-28. Serious TEAEs occurred in 50.7% (roxadustat) and 45.0% (ESA) of patients. Common TEAEs in both treatment groups included hypertension, arteriovenous fistula thrombosis, headache, and diarrhea.

Conclusion: Roxadustat was non-inferior to ESAs in maintaining hemoglobin levels in this cohort of patients with anemia of CKD on dialysis for at least 4 months who were previously treated with ESAs. Observed TEAEs were consistent with previous studies.

Keywords: Chronic kidney disease; Hemodialysis; Peritoneal dialysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flow chart. aHemoglobin was maintained within 10–12 g/dL. bThe choice of anemia treatment was at the discretion of the investigator. cPatients could have taken epoetin (i.e., epoetin alfa, beta, theta, zeta, delta, or omega) or darbepoetin alfa prior to randomization. dPatients received epoetin alfa if they were on epoetin (i.e., epoetin alfa, beta, theta, zeta, delta, or omega) prior to randomization or darbepoetin alfa if they were on darbepoetin alfa prior to randomization. ESA erythropoiesis-stimulating agent, R randomization
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Patient disposition. ESA erythropoiesis-stimulating agent, GCP good clinical practices
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mean (SD) hemoglobin concentrations (per protocol set). BL baseline, ESA erythropoiesis-stimulating agent, SD standard deviation
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Mean (SD) low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by visit (full analysis set). ESA erythropoiesis-stimulating agent, LDL low-density lipoprotein

References

    1. Locatelli F, Fishbane S, Block GA, Macdougall IC. Targeting hypoxia-inducible factors for the treatment of anemia in chronic kidney disease patients. Am J Nephrol. 2017;45(3):187–199. doi: 10.1159/000455166. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Babitt JL, Lin HY. Mechanisms of anemia in CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;23(10):1631–1634. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2011111078. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sibbel SP, Koro CE, Brunelli SM, Cobitz AR. Characterization of chronic and acute ESA hyporesponse: a retrospective cohort study of hemodialysis patients. BMC Nephrol. 2015;16:144. doi: 10.1186/s12882-015-0138-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Luo J, Jensen DE, Maroni BJ, Brunelli SM. Spectrum and burden of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent hyporesponsiveness among contemporary hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016;68(5):763–771. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.05.031. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Johnson DW, Pollock CA, Macdougall IC. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent hyporesponsiveness. Nephrology (Carlton) 2007;12(4):321–330. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2007.00810.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types