Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021;59(3):132-137.
doi: 10.5114/reum.2021.105974. Epub 2021 May 13.

Plagiarism detection and prevention: a primer for researchers

Affiliations

Plagiarism detection and prevention: a primer for researchers

Olena Zimba et al. Reumatologia. 2021.

Abstract

Plagiarism is an ethical misconduct affecting the quality, readability, and trustworthiness of scholarly publications. Improving researcher awareness of plagiarism of words, ideas, and graphics is essential for avoiding unacceptable writing practices. Global editorial associations have publicized their statements on strategies to clean literature from redundant, stolen, and misleading information. Consulting related documents is advisable for upgrading author instructions and warning plagiarists of academic and other consequences of the unethical conduct. A lack of creative thinking and poor academic English skills are believed to compound most instances of redundant and "copy-and-paste" writing. Plagiarism detection software largely relies on reporting text similarities. However, manual checks are required to reveal inappropriate referencing, copyright violations, and substandard English writing. Medical researchers and authors may improve their writing skills and avoid the same errors by consulting the list of retractions due to plagiarism which are tracked on the PubMed platform and discussed on the Retraction Watch blog.

Keywords: plagiarism; publication ethics; publishing; rheumatology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Bouville M. Plagiarism: words and ideas. Sci Eng Ethics. 2008;14:311–322. doi: 10.1007/s11948-008-9057-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Vasconcelos SM, Roig M. Prior Publication and Redundancy in Contemporary Science: Are Authors and Editors at the Crossroads? Sci Eng Ethics. 2015;21:1367–1378. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9599-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roig M. Avoiding unethical writing practices. Food Chem Toxicol. 2012;50:3385–3387. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2012.06.043. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang T, Xing QR, Wang H, Chen W. Retracted Publications in the Biomedical Literature from Open Access Journals. Sci Eng Ethics. 2019;25:855–868. doi: 10.1007/s11948-018-0040-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Heaven D. AI peer reviewers unleashed to ease publishing grind. Nature. 2018;563:609–610. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-07245-9. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources