Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 16;9(10):E1456-E1462.
doi: 10.1055/a-1486-6729. eCollection 2021 Oct.

Colonoscopy quality across Europe: a report of the European Colonoscopy Quality Investigation (ECQI) Group

Affiliations

Colonoscopy quality across Europe: a report of the European Colonoscopy Quality Investigation (ECQI) Group

Cristiano Spada et al. Endosc Int Open. .

Abstract

Background and study aims The European Colonoscopy Quality Investigation (ECQI) Group comprises expert colonoscopists and investigators with the aim of raising colonoscopy standards. We assessed the levels of monitoring and achievement of European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) performance measures (PMs) across Europe using responses to the ECQI questionnaires. Methods The questionnaire comprises three forms: institution and practitioner questionnaires are completed once; a procedure questionnaire is completed on multiple occasions for individual total colonoscopies. ESGE PMs were approximated as closely as possible from the data collected via the procedure questionnaire. Procedure data could provide rate of adequate bowel preparation, cecal intubation rate (CIR), withdrawal time, polyp detection rate (PDR), and tattooing resection sites. Results We evaluated ECQI questionnaire data collected between June 2016 and April 2018, comprising 91 practitioner and 52 institution questionnaires. A total of 6445 completed procedure forms were received. Institution and practitioner responses indicate that routine recording of PMs is not widespread: adenoma detection rate (ADR) is routinely recorded in 29 % of institutions and by 34 % of practitioners; PDR by 42 % and 47 %, CIR by 62 % and 64 %, bowel preparation quality by 56 % and 76 %, respectively. Procedure data showed a rate of adequate bowel preparation of 84.2 %, CIR 73.4 %, PDR 40.5 %, mean withdrawal time 7.8 minutes and 12.2 % of procedures with possible removal of a non-pedunculated lesion ≥ 20 mm reporting tattooing. Conclusions Our findings clearly show areas in need of quality improvement and the importance of promoting quality monitoring throughout the colonoscopy procedure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests Dr. Spada is a consultant and advisory board participant for Norgine, AlfaSigma, Medtronic, Given Imaging, Covidien, Olympus, Intromedic, and AnX Robotica. A. Koulaouzidis reports material support from IntroMedic/SynMedUK, Jinshan/Aquilant; honoraria from Ferring UK, Dr Falk Pharma UK; travel support from Norgine, Jinshan/Aquilant; advisory board Dr Falk Pharma UK, Tillots; Given ® Imaging Ltd/ESGE research grant 2011; cofounder AJM Med-i-caps Ltd. P. Amaro reports consultancy and advisory board participant for Norgine. L. Brink reports consultancy & advisory board participant AMBU; travel support from Norgine. W. Fischbach reports consultancy and advisory board participant to Norgine; speaking – Abbott, Bio Merieux, Falk; advisory speaking – Aptalis, Fresenius Biotech, Pfizer; advisory – Boehringer Ingelheim, med update. M. Hünger reports travel support from Norgine. R. Jover reports consultancy – Norgine, MSD, GI Supply, CPP Pharma. U. Kinnunen reports travel support from Norgine. A. Ono reports travel support from Norgine. B. Amlani reports employee of Norgine. E. Toth reports consultancy and advisory board participant for Norgine. A. Agrawal, G. Antonelli, C. Hassan, Á. Patai, S. Pecere, L. Petruzziello, J.F. Riemann, L. Fuccio declare that they have no conflict of interest. Dr. Staines received fees for statistical services and Ann L. Stringer received fees for manuscript preparation from the ECQI Secretariat.

References

    1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62:10–29. - PubMed
    1. Edwards B K, Ward E, Kohler B A et al.Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates. Cancer. 2010;116:544–573. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kaminski M F, Regula J, Kraszewska E et al.Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1795–1803. - PubMed
    1. Corley D A, Jensen C D, Marks A R et al.Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1298–1306. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson J C, Butterly L F. Colonoscopy: quality indicators. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2015;6:e 77. - PMC - PubMed