Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun 5;7(11):e2301.
doi: 10.21769/BioProtoc.2301.

DNA Fiber Assay upon Treatment with Ultraviolet Radiations

Affiliations

DNA Fiber Assay upon Treatment with Ultraviolet Radiations

Alfano Luigi et al. Bio Protoc. .

Abstract

Genome stability is continuously challenged by a wide range of DNA damaging factors. To promote a correct DNA repair and cell survival, cells orchestrate a coordinated and finely tuned cascade of events collectively known as the DNA Damage Response (DDR). Ultra Violet (UV) rays are among the main environmental sources of DNA damage and a well recognized cancer risk factor. UV rays induce the formation of toxic cyclobutane-type pyrimidine dimers (CPD) and [6-4]pyrimidine-pyrimidone (6-4PP) photoproducts which trigger the activation of the intra-S phase cell cycle checkpoint (Kaufmann, 2010) aimed at preventing replication fork collapse, late origin firing, and stabilizing fragile sites (Branzei and Foiani, 2009). To monitor the activation of the intra-S phase checkpoint in response to UV type C (UVC) exposure, the DNA fiber assay can be used to analyse the new origin firing and DNA synthesis rate ( Jackson et al., 1998 ; Merrick et al., 2004 ; Alfano et al., 2016 ). The DNA fiber assay technique was conceived in the 90s and then further developed through the use of thymidine analogues (such as CldU and IdU), which are incorporated into the nascent DNA strands. By treating the cells in sequential mode with these analogues, which can be visualized through specific antibodies carrying different fluorophores, it is possible to monitor the replication fork activity and assess how this is influenced by UV radiations or others agents.

Keywords: Cell cycle checkpoints; DNA damage; DNA fiber assay; Halogenated pyrimidines; Ultra Violet radiation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Schematic overview of the protocol
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Representative kinds of DNA fibers identified by using this protocol.
The sequential labelling provides a snapshot of different DNA replication steps: 1) Ongoing forks can appear as in a (in the case of unidirectional progression through the replication fork) or as in b (in the case of bidirectional progression through the replication fork). 2) Termination events can appear as in a (as an only-green line in the case of a replication origin in which DNA synthesis terminated while the cells were still undergoing incubation with the first label), or as in b (as adjoined red-green-red signals with divergent trend). 3) New fired origins appear as shown in the lower panel of the figure. These origins were fired during incubation with the second label (consisting of an only-red line, according to the protocol herein described).

References

    1. Alfano L., Costa C., Caporaso A., Altieri A., Indovina P., Macaluso M., Giordano A. and Pentimalli F.(2016). NONO regulates the intra-S-phase checkpoint in response to UV radiation. Oncogene 35(5): 567-576. - PubMed
    1. Bensimon A., Simon A., Chiffaudel A., Croquette V., Heslot F. and Bensimon D.(1994). Alignment and sensitive detection of DNA by a moving interface. Science 265(5181): 2096-8. - PubMed
    1. Branzei D. and Foiani M.(2009). The checkpoint response to replication stress. DNA Repair(Amst) 8(9): 1038-1046. - PubMed
    1. Cairns J.(1963). The bacterial chromosome and its manner of replication as seen by autoradiography. J Mol Biol 6: 208-13. - PubMed
    1. Hanahan D. and Weinberg B.(2011). Hallmarks of Cancer: The next generation. Cell 144(5): 646-674. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources