Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 20;22(1):34.
doi: 10.1186/s40510-021-00379-z.

Stability prediction of early orthopedic treatment in Class III malocclusion: morphologic discriminant analysis

Affiliations

Stability prediction of early orthopedic treatment in Class III malocclusion: morphologic discriminant analysis

V Paoloni et al. Prog Orthod. .

Abstract

Background: To evaluate morphologic differences between class III malocclusion success and failure treatment subjects in order to identify which variables are more predictive for long-term stability in early orthopedic treatment. In this retrospective study, 31 patients were enrolled from the Department of Orthodontics (Rome Tor Vergata). Inclusion criteria were as follows: white ancestry, class III malocclusion, mixed dentition, cervical stage (CS) 1-2, no pseudo-class III. Pre-treatment radiographic and cast records were collected. Each patient underwent rapid maxillary expansion/facial mask/bite block (RME/FM/BB) orthopedic treatment until correction. At T1 (permanent dentition, CS4), records were recollected. According to treatment stability, relapse group (RG, 19) and success group (SG, 12) were identified. Sagittal and vertical cephalometric and digital cast measurements were performed. Student's t tests were used for statistically significant differences inter and intra groups. For discriminant analysis, relapse or success status was added to each patient's T0 data.

Results: At T0, RG showed larger upper anterior transversal width (p = 0.0266), while at T1 the upper anterior length was shorter than SG (p = 0.0028). Between T1 and T0, both groups showed larger upper anterior and posterior transversal widths. SG had greater upper anterior (p = 0.0066) and posterior (p = 0.449) sagittal length. RG presented larger lower anterior (p = 0.0012) and posterior (p = 0.0002) transversal widths, while there were no differences in SG lower arch. Discriminant analysis provided two predictive variables with an accuracy of 80.6%: upper anterior length and upper posterior length.

Conclusion: A shorter and wider maxilla could be a predisposing factor for relapse and failure of the early orthopedic treatment of class III malocclusion patients. The absence of mandibular changes could be predictable for treatment success.

Keywords: Class III malocclusion; Dental cast analysis; Discriminant analysis; Early orthopedic treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Angular and linear measurements performed at pre-treatment and post-treatment phase on lateral cephalometric radiographs
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Transversal and sagittal linear measurements performed at pre-treatment and post-treatment phase on upper and lower digital casts
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Graphic description of palatal area measurement, comprised within the crossing point between lingual groove and gingival border of both deciduous and permanent upper incisors, canines, premolars, and molars
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Graphic representation of discriminant analysis scores: blue points RG; red points SG

References

    1. Battagel J-M. The aetiological factors in class III malocclusion. Eur J Orthod. 1993;15(5):347–370. doi: 10.1093/ejo/15.5.347. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zere E, Chaudhari P-K, Sharan J, Dhingra K, Tiwari N. Developing class III malocclusions: challenges and solutions. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2018;10:99–116. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S134303. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Campbell P-M. The dilemma of class III treatment. Early or late? Angle Orthod. 1983;53(3):175–191. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1983)053<0175:TDOCIT>2.0.CO;2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara J-A., Jr Treatment and posttreatment craniofacial changes after rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2000;118(4):404–413. doi: 10.1067/mod.2000.109840. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baccetti T, Reyes B-C, McNamara J-A., Jr Craniofacial changes in class III malocclusion as related to skeletal and dental maturation. Am J Orthod Dentofac Ortho P. 2007;132(2):171–178. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources