Clinical characteristics of two-hundred thirty-two dogs (2006-2018) treated for suspected anaphylaxis in Perth, Western Australia
- PMID: 34541658
- DOI: 10.1111/avj.13114
Clinical characteristics of two-hundred thirty-two dogs (2006-2018) treated for suspected anaphylaxis in Perth, Western Australia
Abstract
Objective: To describe the clinical features of dogs treated for suspected anaphylaxis in Perth, Western Australia.
Design: Single-centre observational case series with retrospective and prospective phases.
Methods: This was a two-phase study of dogs with clinical suspicion of anaphylaxis presenting to the emergency service of a university teaching hospital. Dogs required evidence of, and appropriate treatment of, a type 1 hypersensitivity reaction as well as two or more organs affected (or cardiovascular signs alone) to be included. Phase 1 includes retrospective case series of 186 dogs (March 2006-December 2018). Phase 2 includes prospective descriptive case series of 46 dogs (October 2017-July 2018) focused on clinical signs.
Results: In phase 1, 88 (47%) dogs had evidence of insect exposure prior to the acute event. One hundred forty (75%) dogs had dermatological signs, 141 (76%) had gastrointestinal signs and 129 (69%) had cardiovascular signs. Ninety-two (49%) dogs had vasoconstrictive shock (5 with bradycardia), 24 (13%) had vasodilatory shock, 8 (4%) had mixed vasodilatory and vasoconstrictive shock and 5 (3%) had unclassifiable shock. On focused abdominal ultrasound, 42 of 71 (59%) dogs had gallbladder wall oedema and 3 of 71 (4%) dogs had peritoneal free fluid. In phase 2, the distributions of insect exposure, organ dysfunction and sonographic abnormalities were similar to phase 1.
Conclusion: Dogs presenting with suspected anaphylaxis showed a broad range of presentations. Dermatological signs were absent in a proportion of dogs, vasoconstrictive shock was more frequent than vasodilatory and unique features of shock were identified. This study highlights the challenges of diagnosis based on presenting features alone.
Keywords: allergy; anaphylactic shock; gallbladder wall oedema; hymenoptera; hypersensitivity reaction; ultrasound.
© 2021 Australian Veterinary Association.
References
-
- Shmuel DL, Cortes Y. Anaphylaxis in dogs and cats. J Vet Emerg Crit Care 2013;23:377-394.
-
- Melli G, Mazzei D, Vitolo E et al. Shock organ and shock tissue in various animal species. Acta Allergol 1963;18:188-210.
-
- Kapin MA, Ferguson JL. Hemodynamic and regional circulatory alterations in dog during anaphylactic challenge. Am J Physiol Renal 1985:248(2):430-437.
-
- Moore GE, Guptill LF, Ward MP et al. Adverse events diagnosed within three days of vaccine administration in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005;227:1102-1108.
-
- Srugo I, Aroch I, Bruchim Y. Anaphylactic reaction to a spider (Chaetopelma aegyptiaca) bite in a dog. Isr J Vet Med 2009;64:84-87.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
