Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Nov 1;78(11):1333-1344.
doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.3188.

Use and Safety of Immunotherapeutic Management of N-Methyl-d-Aspartate Receptor Antibody Encephalitis: A Meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Use and Safety of Immunotherapeutic Management of N-Methyl-d-Aspartate Receptor Antibody Encephalitis: A Meta-analysis

Margherita Nosadini et al. JAMA Neurol. .

Abstract

Importance: Overall, immunotherapy has been shown to improve outcomes and reduce relapses in individuals with N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antibody encephalitis (NMDARE); however, the superiority of specific treatments and combinations remains unclear.

Objective: To map the use and safety of immunotherapies in individuals with NMDARE, identify early predictors of poor functional outcome and relapse, evaluate changes in immunotherapy use and disease outcome over the 14 years since first reports of NMDARE, and assess the Anti-NMDAR Encephalitis One-Year Functional Status (NEOS) score.

Data sources: Systematic search in PubMed from inception to January 1, 2019.

Study selection: Published articles including patients with NMDARE with positive NMDAR antibodies and available individual immunotherapy data.

Data extraction and synthesis: Individual patient data on immunotherapies, clinical characteristics at presentation, disease course, and final functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score) were entered into multivariable logistic regression models.

Main outcomes and measures: The planned study outcomes were functional outcome at 12 months from disease onset (good, mRS score of 0 to 2; poor, mRS score greater than 2) and monophasic course (absence of relapse at 24 months or later from onset).

Results: Data from 1550 patients from 652 articles were evaluated. Of these, 1105 of 1508 (73.3%) were female and 707 of 1526 (46.3%) were 18 years or younger at disease onset. Factors at first event that were significantly associated with good functional outcome included adolescent age and first-line treatment with therapeutic apheresis, corticosteroids plus intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), or corticosteroids plus IVIG plus therapeutic apheresis. Factors significantly associated with poor functional outcome were age younger than 2 years or age of 65 years or older at onset, intensive care unit admission, extreme delta brush pattern on electroencephalography, lack of immunotherapy within the first 30 days of onset, and maintenance IVIG use for 6 months or more. Factors significantly associated with nonrelapsing disease were rituximab use or maintenance IVIG use for 6 months or more. Adolescent age at onset was significantly associated with relapsing disease. Rituximab use increased from 13.5% (52 of 384; 2007 to 2013) to 28.3% (311 of 1100; 2013 to 2019) (P < .001), concurrent with a falling relapse rate over the same period (22% [12 of 55] in 2008 and earlier; 10.9% [35 of 322] in 2017 and later; P = .006). Modified NEOS score (including 4 of 5 original NEOS items) was associated with probability of poor functional status at 1 year (20.1% [40 of 199] for a score of 0 to 1 points; 43.8% [77 of 176] for a score of 3 to 4 points; P = .05).

Conclusions and relevance: Factors influencing functional outcomes and relapse are different and need to be considered independently in development of evidence-based optimal management guidelines of patients with NMDARE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Molteni has received grants from the UK Medical Research Council Fellowship Scheme. Dr Irani has received grants from CSL Behring, UCB Pharma, and Ono Pharmaceutical; personal fees from UCB Pharma and ADC Therapeutics; and is a coapplicant and receives royalties on patent application WO/210/046716. Dr Dalmau has received royalties from Euroimmun and grants from SAGE. Dr Ming Lim has received consultation fees from CSL Behring, Novartis, Octapharma, and Roche; grants from Boston Children’s Hospital Research Funds, Great Ormond Street Hospital grant, and Great Ormond Street Hospital/Guy’s and St Thomas’ Trust/St Mary’s Hospital Charity; and has received travel grants from Merck Serono; and was awarded educational grants to organize meetings by Novartis, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, and Bayer. Dr Armangue has received personal fees from Biogen and Novartis. Dr Cellucci has received personal fees from Novartis Canada. Dr Deiva has received personal fees from Novartis, Biogen, Sanofi, and Viela and nonfinancial support from Novartis. Dr Gombolay receives part-time salary support from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to review acute flaccid myelitis cases for surveillance. Dr Gorman has received research funding from Pfizer and Roche. Dr Neuteboom participates in treatment studies in pediatric multiple sclerosis by Novartis and Sanofi-Genzyme and has received consultation fees from Novartis, Zogenix, and Sanofi-Genzyme. Dr Rostásy participates in treatment studies in pediatric multiple sclerosis by Roche. Dr Tenembaum has received personal fees from Biogen Idec Argentina, Genzyme, Novartis Pharma, Novartis Argentina, Genentech-Roche, and Alexion Pharmaceuticals. Dr Wickstrom has received grants from the Stockholm City Council and Hjärnfonden; consultation fees from Roche, Novartis, and Octapharma; and personal fees from Octapharma, Roche, GW Pharma, and Biogen. Dr Yeshokumar has received personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Associations Between Age at Onset and Sex and Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score
A, Patients with reported age at disease onset are displayed (n = 1517). Of these, sex was reported for 1497 of 1517 patients and tumor status for 1491 of 1517 patients. A total of 1160 of 1517 patients (76.5%) had an age at onset of 30 years or younger. Female sex was most pronounced among teenagers and young adults (age, 13 to 30 years; 634 of 763 [83.1%]), less pronounced in children 12 years and younger (237 of 383 [61.9%]), and reversed in adults 50 years and older (55 of 118 [46.6%]). Overall, 389 of 1524 patients (25.6%) had a tumor (ovarian teratoma or other ovarian tumor in 324 of 1524 [21.3%]), and tumors were more frequent in adults (290 of 802 [36.2%]) than children (93 of 698 [13.3%]; χ2 = 102.4; P < .001), and in female patients (347 of 1097 [31.6%]) than male patients (33 of 395 [8.4%]; χ2 = 82.9; P < .001). B, Outcome (mRS score at final follow-up) according to age at disease onset in 1269 patients. Patients with onset in infancy (2 years or younger) or older adulthood (65 years or older) tended to have worse outcome.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Independent Association of Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Factors With Functional Outcome at 12 Months and Relapsing Disease Course at 24 Months and Later
Results from the bootstrapped logistic regression models are displayed. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs), 95% CIs, and P values were derived from the distributions of the regression coefficients over 10 000 folds. CSF indicates cerebrospinal fluid; EEG, electroencephalography; IVIG, intravenous immunoglobulin; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; TA, therapeutic apheresis.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Changes in Rituximab Use at First N-Methyl-d-Aspartate Receptor Antibody Encephalitis (NMDARE) Event and Changes in Relapse Rate Over Time
Data are displayed over 6 temporal epochs, defined by the year of disease onset, if reported; otherwise, the year of publication was used. A, Proportion of patients receiving rituximab at first event over 6 temporal epochs in the whole cohort (363 of 1484 patients [24.5%]) and in the subset of patients with severe disease (modified Rankin Scale score of 5) at first event (205 of 627 [32.7%]), showing a greater increase in the proportion of rituximab use in patients with severe disease. B, Proportion of patients with reported relapse over 6 temporal epochs (182 of 1380 patients [13.2%]). Error bars represent 95% CIs.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Association Between Modified Anti-NMDAR Encephalitis One-Year Functional Status (NEOS) Score and 1-Year Functional Status
Probability of good functional status (modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2) at 1 year after disease onset according to the modified NEOS score for all patients with available data in the imputed (n = 582) and nonimputed (n = 112) data sets. Error bars represent 95% CIs.

References

    1. Titulaer MJ, McCracken L, Gabilondo I, et al. . Treatment and prognostic factors for long-term outcome in patients with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: an observational cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12(2):157-165. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70310-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. de Bruijn MAAM, Aarsen FK, van Oosterhout MP, et al. ; CHANCE Study Group . Long-term neuropsychological outcome following pediatric anti-NMDAR encephalitis. Neurology. 2018;90(22):e1997-e2005. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000005605 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Irani SR, Bera K, Waters P, et al. . N-methyl-d-aspartate antibody encephalitis: temporal progression of clinical and paraclinical observations in a predominantly non-paraneoplastic disorder of both sexes. Brain. 2010;133(pt 6):1655-1667. doi:10.1093/brain/awq113 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hacohen Y, Absoud M, Hemingway C, et al. . NMDA receptor antibodies associated with distinct white matter syndromes. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2014;1(1):e2. doi:10.1212/NXI.0000000000000002 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Byrne S, Walsh C, Hacohen Y, et al. . Earlier treatment of NMDAR antibody encephalitis in children results in a better outcome. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2015;2(4):e130. doi:10.1212/NXI.0000000000000130 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms