Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 20;23(10):e32328.
doi: 10.2196/32328.

Ethics, Integrity, and Retributions of Digital Detection Surveillance Systems for Infectious Diseases: Systematic Literature Review

Ivy Y Zhao #  1 , Ye Xuan Ma #  2 , Man Wai Cecilia Yu  2 , Jia Liu  3 , Wei Nan Dong  2 , Qin Pang  4 , Xiao Qin Lu  5 , Alex Molassiotis  1 , Eleanor Holroyd  6 , Chi Wai William Wong  2   7
Affiliations

Ethics, Integrity, and Retributions of Digital Detection Surveillance Systems for Infectious Diseases: Systematic Literature Review

Ivy Y Zhao et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has increased the importance of the deployment of digital detection surveillance systems to support early warning and monitoring of infectious diseases. These opportunities create a "double-edge sword," as the ethical governance of such approaches often lags behind technological achievements.

Objective: The aim was to investigate ethical issues identified from utilizing artificial intelligence-augmented surveillance or early warning systems to monitor and detect common or novel infectious disease outbreaks.

Methods: In a number of databases, we searched relevant articles that addressed ethical issues of using artificial intelligence, digital surveillance systems, early warning systems, and/or big data analytics technology for detecting, monitoring, or tracing infectious diseases according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, and further identified and analyzed them with a theoretical framework.

Results: This systematic review identified 29 articles presented in 6 major themes clustered under individual, organizational, and societal levels, including awareness of implementing digital surveillance, digital integrity, trust, privacy and confidentiality, civil rights, and governance. While these measures were understandable during a pandemic, the public had concerns about receiving inadequate information; unclear governance frameworks; and lack of privacy protection, data integrity, and autonomy when utilizing infectious disease digital surveillance. The barriers to engagement could widen existing health care disparities or digital divides by underrepresenting vulnerable and at-risk populations, and patients' highly sensitive data, such as their movements and contacts, could be exposed to outside sources, impinging significantly upon basic human and civil rights.

Conclusions: Our findings inform ethical considerations for service delivery models for medical practitioners and policymakers involved in the use of digital surveillance for infectious disease spread, and provide a basis for a global governance structure.

Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42021259180; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=259180.

Keywords: artificial intelligence; electronic medical records; ethics; infectious diseases; machine learning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flowchart of the literature review.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Vlieg WL, Fanoy EB, van Asten L, Liu X, Yang J, Pilot E, Bijkerk P, van der Hoek W, Krafft T, van der Sande MA, Liu Q. Comparing national infectious disease surveillance systems: China and the Netherlands. BMC Public Health. 2017 May 08;17(1):415. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4319-3. https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-017-43... 10.1186/s12889-017-4319-3 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Garattini C, Raffle J, Aisyah DN, Sartain F, Kozlakidis Z. Big data analytics, infectious diseases and associated ethical impacts. Philos Technol. 2019;32(1):69–85. doi: 10.1007/s13347-017-0278-y. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/31024785 278 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Parker MJ, Fraser C, Abeler-Dörner L, Bonsall D. Ethics of instantaneous contact tracing using mobile phone apps in the control of the COVID-19 pandemic. J Med Ethics. 2020 Jul 04;46(7):427–431. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106314. http://jme.bmj.com/lookup/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=32366705 medethics-2020-106314 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McCarthy M. Slow response contributed to scale of west African Ebola epidemic, CDC concludes. BMJ. 2016 Jul 08;354:i3814. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3814. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Temko A, Marnane W, Boylan G, Lightbody G. Clinical implementation of a neonatal seizure detection algorithm. Decis Support Syst. 2015 Mar;70:86–96. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2014.12.006. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/25892834 S0167-9236(14)00284-X - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types