External Ventricular Drainage Complication Risks and Accuracy Analysis

Abstract

Objective: The setting of external ventricular drainage (EVD) is one of the most frequent procedures in the neurosurgical practice. However, complication risks of this procedure may grow from 5% to 39%. The number of publications concerning the advancement of ventricular drainage setting technique and complication risks identification is increasing year after year. We posed a question on the dependence of complication risks and catheter setting accuracy on the different factors of routine practice of the N. N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center for neurosurgery within the scope of this work.

Methods: The data on patients whose EVD was set in the premotor area in 2019 were collected retrospectively. The surgeons were divided into 3 groups according to their experience valued in years.

Results: The result of drainage setting was considered satisfactory if its end was in the frontal horn or body of the ipsilateral ventricle. Generally, 122 patients passed EVD placement during 2019. According to computed tomography scans of the brain, the drainage position was satisfactory in 85 patients (75.9%) and unsatisfactory in 27 patients (24.1%).

Conclusions: The procedures were performed by surgeons with <2 years of experience in 16.1% of cases, 2-5 years of experience in 25% of cases, and >5 years of experience in 58.9% of cases. The complication risk and accuracy of drainage setting do not depend on surgeon experience, type of bone access, and position in the premotor area.

Keywords: EVD; External ventricular drain; Hydrocephalus.