Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Dec 1;34(6):783-788.
doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000989.

Equitable partnerships between scientists and persons living with spinal cord injury will strengthen research scope, quality, and outcomes

Kim D Anderson  1
Affiliations
Review

Equitable partnerships between scientists and persons living with spinal cord injury will strengthen research scope, quality, and outcomes

Kim D Anderson. Curr Opin Neurol. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: Partnerships across all stakeholders in the research process strengthen the outcomes and ultimate usability of research. The purpose of this review is to discuss the current level of inclusion of people living with spinal cord injury (SCI) in the research process, the science of engagement and benefits of partnerships in research, and emerging resources available to help promote ethical and effective partnerships in SCI research.

Recent findings: Significant strides have been made in interacting with people living with SCI to help identify the problem(s) that are important to study (i.e. the first step in the research process). The SCI research field is lagging in partnering with people living with SCI throughout the rest of the research process despite a plethora of evidence-based principles and strategies for effective partnerships in the broader context of research. There are several emerging resources specific to SCI to help researchers and the community begin to build meaningful partnerships throughout the entire cycle of research.

Summary: The SCI research field already values partnerships with clinicians and promotes the concept of 'bench-to-bedside and back again'. Now is the time to take it a step further to 'bench-to-bedside-to-community and back again'.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Anderson KD. Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord injured population. J Neurotrauma 2004; 21:1371–1383.
    1. Kirshblum S, Didesch M, Botticello A, et al. Patient preferences for order of the sensory portion of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) examination. J Spinal Cord Med 2019; 42:719–724.
    1. Ter Wengel PV, Post MWM, Martin E, et al. Neurological recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury: what is meaningful? A patients’ and physicians’ perspective. Spinal Cord 2020; 58:865–872.
    1. Bourbeau D, Bolon A, Creasey G, et al. Needs, priorities, and attitudes of individuals with spinal cord injury toward nerve stimulation devices for bladder and bowel function: a survey. Spinal Cord 2020; 58:1216–1226.
    1. Fekete C, Brach M, Ehrmann C, et al. Cohort profile of the International Spinal Cord Injury Community Survey implemented in 22 countries. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2020; 101:2103–2111.