Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 14;42(39):4053-4063.
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab592.

Predictors of mortality in thrombotic thrombocytopenia after adenoviral COVID-19 vaccination: the FAPIC score

Affiliations

Predictors of mortality in thrombotic thrombocytopenia after adenoviral COVID-19 vaccination: the FAPIC score

Jimin Hwang et al. Eur Heart J. .

Abstract

Aims: The clinical manifestation and outcomes of thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) after adenoviral COVID-19 vaccine administration are largely unknown due to the rare nature of the disease. We aimed to analyse the clinical presentation, treatment modalities, outcomes, and prognostic factors of adenoviral TTS, as well as identify predictors for mortality.

Methods and results: PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched and the resulting articles were reviewed. A total of 6 case series and 13 case reports (64 patients) of TTS after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination were included. We performed a pooled analysis and developed a novel scoring system to predict mortality. The overall mortality of TTS after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination was 35.9% (23/64). In our analysis, age ≤60 years, platelet count <25 × 103/µL, fibrinogen <150 mg/dL, the presence of intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH), and the presence of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) were significantly associated with death and were selected as predictors for mortality (1 point each). We named this novel scoring system FAPIC (fibrinogen, age, platelet count, ICH, and CVT), and the C-statistic for the FAPIC score was 0.837 (95% CI 0.732-0.942). Expected mortality increased with each point increase in the FAPIC score, at 2.08, 6.66, 19.31, 44.54, 72.94, and 90.05% with FAPIC scores 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. The FAPIC scoring model was internally validated through cross-validation and bootstrapping, then externally validated on a panel of TTS patients after Ad26.COV2.S administration.

Conclusions: Fibrinogen levels, age, platelet count, and the presence of ICH and CVT were significantly associated with mortality in patients with TTS, and the FAPIC score comprising these risk factors could predict mortality. The FAPIC score could be used in the clinical setting to recognize TTS patients at high risk of adverse outcomes and provide early intensive interventions including intravenous immunoglobulins and non-heparin anticoagulants.

Keywords: COVID-19 vaccine; Cerebral venous thrombosis; ChAdOx1 nCoV-19; Thrombotic thrombocytopenia syndrome; Vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract
The FAPIC scoring model, a summary score comprising fibrinogen, age, platelet count, intracerebral haemorrhage, and cerebral venous thrombosis, can be used to predict mortality in adenoviral vaccine-associated thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome. AUC, area under the curve; VITT, vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Estimated mortality in patients with TTS after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination by FAPIC score (A) and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve with the area under the curve (AUC) (B) of the FAPIC score. Variables included in the FAPIC score were: age ≤60 years, platelet count <25 × 103/µL, fibrinogen <150 mg/dL, the presence of intracerebral haemorrhage, and the presence of cerebral venous thrombosis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the curve (AUC) of the FAPIC score on cross-validation (A) and bootstrapping (B).

Comment in

References

    1. Johns H. Coronavirus Resource Center. COVID-19 Map [Internet]. 2021. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html (28 April 2021).
    1. Gavi C. COVID-19 Vaccine Advance Market Commitment [Internet]. 2021. https://www.gavi.org/gavi-covax-amc (28 April 2021).
    1. Hodgson SH, Mansatta K, Mallett G, Harris V, Emary KRW, Pollard AJ. What defines an efficacious COVID-19 vaccine? A review of the challenges assessing the clinical efficacy of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. Lancet Infect Dis 2021;21:e26–e35. - PMC - PubMed
    1. European Medicines Agency. COVID-19 vaccines: authorised [Internet]. 2021. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory/overview/public-health-thr... (29 April 2021).
    1. Food and Drug Administration. COVID-19 Vaccines. FDA [Internet]. 2021. https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-dise... (29 April 2021).