APC gene promoter methylation as a potential biomarker for lung cancer diagnosis: A meta-analysis
- PMID: 34545707
- PMCID: PMC8563159
- DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.14151
APC gene promoter methylation as a potential biomarker for lung cancer diagnosis: A meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to quantitatively analysis the diagnostic performance of adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene promoter methylation in serum or sputum/bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BLAF) as a biomarker for lung cancer identification through pooling of open published data.
Methods: The relevant electronic MEDLINE, EMBASE, Ovid, web of science and CNKI databases were systematically searched to identify the studies related to APC gene promoter methylation for lung cancer diagnosis. Data of true positive (tp), false positive (fp), false negative (fn) and true negative (tn) were extracted from the publications included in the study. The pooled diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and area under summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve (AUC-SROC) of APC gene promoter methylation were calculated. Publication bias was evaluated by Begg's funnel plot and Egger's line regression test.
Results: Fourteen studies associated with APC gene promoter methylation and lung cancer were identified in the databases and finally included in the meta-analysis. The data was pooled using a random effect model due to significant statistical heterogeneity across the 14 studies (p < 0.05). Using the APC gene promoter methylation as a reference for lung cancer identification, the pooled diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 0.43 (95% CI: 0.40-0.45), and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.90-0.95), respectively with combined diagnostic positive likelihood ratio (+LR) and negative likelihood ratio (-LR) of 7.15 (95% CI: 3.62-14.12) and 0.63 (95% CI: 0.57-0.71). The pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and AUC-SROC of APC gene promoter methylation for lung cancer diagnosis were 9.84 (95% CI: 5.77-16.79) and 0.7, respectively. The Begg's funnel plot and Egger's line regression test both indicated statistical publication bias (t = 5.40, p < 0.05).
Conclusions: APC gene promoter methylation in serum or sputum/BLAF is a potential biomarker for lung cancer diagnosis with high specificity. However, due to its low sensitivity, it may not be suitable for lung cancer screening in the general population.
Keywords: adenomatous polyposis coli; lung cancer; meta-analysis; methylation; promoter.
© 2021 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors confirm that there is no conflict of interest.
Figures








Similar articles
-
MGMT gene promoter methylation in humoral tissue as biomarker for lung cancer diagnosis: An update meta-analysis.Thorac Cancer. 2021 Dec;12(23):3194-3200. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.14186. Epub 2021 Oct 15. Thorac Cancer. 2021. PMID: 34651448 Free PMC article.
-
APC gene promoter aberrant methylation in serum as a biomarker for breast cancer diagnosis: A meta-analysis.Thorac Cancer. 2018 Feb;9(2):284-290. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12580. Epub 2018 Jan 3. Thorac Cancer. 2018. PMID: 29297603 Free PMC article.
-
P16INK4a gene promoter methylation as a biomarker for the diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer: An updated meta-analysis.Thorac Cancer. 2018 Aug;9(8):1032-1040. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12783. Epub 2018 Jun 21. Thorac Cancer. 2018. PMID: 29927090 Free PMC article.
-
The Evidence Base for Circulating Tumor DNA-Methylation in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers (Basel). 2024 Oct 29;16(21):3641. doi: 10.3390/cancers16213641. Cancers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39518079 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Association of APC gene promoter methylation and the risk of gastric cancer: A meta-analysis and bioinformatics study.Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Apr;99(16):e19828. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019828. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. PMID: 32312003 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Constructing methylation-driven ceRNA networks unveil tumor heterogeneity and predict patient prognosis.Hum Mol Genet. 2025 Feb 1;34(3):251-264. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddae176. Hum Mol Genet. 2025. PMID: 39603659 Free PMC article.
-
Epigenomic Echoes-Decoding Genomic and Epigenetic Instability to Distinguish Lung Cancer Types and Predict Relapse.Epigenomes. 2025 Feb 5;9(1):5. doi: 10.3390/epigenomes9010005. Epigenomes. 2025. PMID: 39982247 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Association of DNA methylation of RASSF1A and SHOX2 with lung cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Dec 13;103(50):e40042. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040042. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024. PMID: 39686414 Free PMC article.
-
Epigenetic modifications in early stage lung cancer: pathogenesis, biomarkers, and early diagnosis.MedComm (2020). 2025 Feb 21;6(3):e70080. doi: 10.1002/mco2.70080. eCollection 2025 Mar. MedComm (2020). 2025. PMID: 39991629 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Use of DNA methylation patterns for early detection and management of lung cancer: Are we there yet?Oncol Res. 2025 Mar 19;33(4):781-793. doi: 10.32604/or.2024.057231. eCollection 2025. Oncol Res. 2025. PMID: 40191732 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424. - PubMed
-
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:7–33. - PubMed
-
- Zheng RS, Sun KX, Zhang SW, Zeng HM, Zou XN, Chen R, et al. [Report of cancer epidemiology in China, 2015]. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2019;41:19–28. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous