Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2021 Dec;190(3):415-424.
doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06375-5. Epub 2021 Sep 21.

Metronomic chemotherapy (mCHT) in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients: results of the VICTOR-6 study

Collaborators, Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Metronomic chemotherapy (mCHT) in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients: results of the VICTOR-6 study

M E Cazzaniga et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents a subtype of breast cancer which lacks the expression of oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2): TNBC accounts for approximately 20% of newly diagnosed breast cancers and is associated with younger age at diagnosis, greater recurrence risk and shorter survival time. Therapeutic options are very scarce. Aim of the present analysis is to provide further insights into the clinical activity of metronomic chemotherapy (mCHT), in a real-life setting.

Methods: We used data included in the VICTOR-6 study for the present analysis. VICTOR-6 is an Italian multicentre retrospective cohort study, which collected data of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients who have received mCHT between 2011 and 2016. Amongst the 584 patients included in the study, 97 were triple negative. In 40.2% of the TNBC patients, mCHT was the first chemotherapy treatment, whereas 32.9% had received 2 or more lines of treatment for the metastatic disease. 45.4% out of 97 TNBC patients received a vinorelbine (VRL)-based regimen, which resulted in the most used type of mCHT, followed by cyclophosphamide (CTX)-based regimens (30.9%) and capecitabine (CAPE)-based combinations (22.7%).

Results: Overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 17.5% and 64.9%, respectively. Median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 6.0 months (95% CI: 4.9-7.2) and 12.1 months (95% CI: 9.6-16.7). Median PFS was 6.9 months for CAPE-based regimens (95% CI: 5.0-18.4), 6.1 months (95% CI: 4.0-8.9) for CTX-based and 5.3 months (95% CI: 4.1-9.5) for VRL-based ones. Median OS was 18.2 months (95% CI: 9.1-NE) for CAPE-based regimens and 11.8 months for VRL- (95% CI: 9.3-16.7 and CTX-based ones (95%CI: 8.7-52.8). Tumour response, PFS and OS decreased proportionally in later lines.

Conclusion: This analysis represents the largest series of TNBC patients treated with mCHT in a real-life setting and provides further insights into the advantages of using this strategy even in this poor prognosis subpopulation.

Keywords: Capecitabine; Cyclophosphamide; Methotrexate; Metronomic chemotherapy; Triple-negative breast cancer; Vinorelbine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Author Prof. Cazzaniga has a role as consultant/advisory role for: Pierre-Fabre, Roche; Novartis; Lilly; Celgene. Author Vallini I. declares that she has no conflict of interest; Author Dr Montagna has a role as consultant/advisory role for: Pierre-Fabre; Author Dr Amoroso declares that he has no conflict of interest; Author Dr Berardi declares that she has no conflict of interest; Author Dr Butera declares that she has no conflict of interest; Author Dr Cagossi declares that she has no conflict of interest; Author Dr Cavanna has a role as consultant/advisory role for: Astra Zeneca, Ipsen, Janssen; Author Dr Ciccarese declares that she has no conflict of interest;, Author Dr Cinieri has a role as consultant/advisory role for: Ely Lilly, Author Dr Cretella declares that she has no conflict of interest, Author Dr De Conciliis declares that he has no conflict of interest, Author Dr Febbraro declares that he has no conflict of interest, Author Dr Ferraù declares that he has no conflict of interest, Author Dr Ferzi declares that she has no conflict of interest, Author Dr Baldelli declares that he has no conflict of interest, Author Dr Fontana has a role as consultant/advisory role for: Novartis, Roche, Daiichi Sankyo, Pierre Phabre, Eli Lilly; Author Dr Gambaro declares that she has no conflict of interest, Author Dr Garrone declares that she has no conflict of interest, Author Dr Gebbia declares that he has no conflict of interest, Author Dr Generali has received a remuneration of 5.000 € and had a role as consultant/advisory role for: Novartis, FMI, Istituto Gentili, Roche, Pfizer, Ely Lilly, Author Dr Gianni declares that he has no conflict of interest, Author Dr Giovanardi declares that he has no conflict of interest,, Author Dr Grassadonia declares that he has no conflict of interest, Author Dr Leonardi declares that she has no conflict of interest, Author Dr Marchetti declares that he has no conflict of interest, Author Dr Sarti declares that she has no conflict of interest, Author Dr Musolino remuneration acting as consultant/advisory role for: Eisai, Ely Lilly, Seagen, Novartis, Roche; Author Dr Nicolini declares that he has no conflict of interest, Author Dr Putzu declares that he has no conflict of interest,, Author Dr Riccardi declares that he has no conflict of interest,, Author Dr Santini has a role as consultant/advisory role for: Novartis, Lilly, Eisai; Author Dr Saracchini declares that she has no conflict of interest,, Author Dr Sarobba declares that she has no conflict of interest,, Author Dr Schintu declares that she has no conflict of interest, Author Dr Scognamiglio declares that he has no conflict of interest, Author Dr Spadaro declares that he has no conflict of interest,. Author Dr Taverniti declares that he has no conflict of interest, Author Dr Toniolo declares that he has no conflict of interest,, Author Dr Tralongo declares that he has no conflict of interest, Author Dr Turletti declares that she has no conflict of interest, Author Dr Valenza declares that he has no conflict of interest,, Author Dr Valerio declares that he has no conflict of interest, Author Dr Vici Santini has a role as consultant/advisory role for: Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, Gentili, Eli Lilly; Author Clivio declares that he has no conflict of interest and Author Torri declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Progression-Free-Survival of mCHT regimens. a PFS according to the type of mCHT, b PFS according to the line of treatment
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Overall Survival of mCHT regimens. a OS according to the type of mCHT. b OS according to the line of treatment

References

    1. Marotti JD, de Abreu FB, Wells WA, Tsongalis GJ. Triple-negative breast cancer: next-generation sequencing for target identification. Am J Pathol. 2017;187(10):2133–2138. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2017.05.018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yin L, Duan JJ, Bian XW, Yu SC. Triple-negative breast cancer molecular subtyping and treatment progress. Breast Cancer Res. 2020;22(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13058-020-01296-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bardia A, Hurvitz SA, Tolaney SM, Loirat D, Punie K, Oliveira M, Brufsky A, Sardesai SD, Kalinsky K, Zelnak AB, et al. Sacituzumab Govitecan in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(16):1529–1541. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2028485. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schmid P, Adams S, Rugo HS, Schneeweiss A, Barrios CH, Iwata H, Dieras V, Hegg R, Im SA, Shaw Wright G, et al. Atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in advanced triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(22):2108–2121. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1809615. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cazzaniga ME, Cordani N, Capici S, Cogliati V, Riva F, Cerrito MG. Metronomic chemotherapy. Cancers. 2021 doi: 10.3390/cancers13092236. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms